Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;31(1):32-59.
doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Affiliations

What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Gina R Kuperberg et al. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016.

Abstract

We consider several key aspects of prediction in language comprehension: its computational nature, the representational level(s) at which we predict, whether we use higher level representations to predictively pre-activate lower level representations, and whether we 'commit' in any way to our predictions, beyond pre-activation. We argue that the bulk of behavioral and neural evidence suggests that we predict probabilistically and at multiple levels and grains of representation. We also argue that we can, in principle, use higher level inferences to predictively pre-activate information at multiple lower representational levels. We also suggest that the degree and level of predictive pre-activation might be a function of the expected utility of prediction, which, in turn, may depend on comprehenders' goals and their estimates of the relative reliability of their prior knowledge and the bottom-up input. Finally, we argue that all these properties of language understanding can be naturally explained and productively explored within a multi-representational hierarchical actively generative architecture whose goal is to infer the message intended by the producer, and in which predictions play a crucial role in explaining the bottom-up input.

Keywords: generative model; language comprehension; prediction error; probabilistic; surprisal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allopenna PD, Magnuson JS, Tanenhaus MK. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language. 1998;38(4):419–439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558.
    1. Altmann GT. Thematic role assignment in context. Journal of Memory and Language. 1999;41(1):124–145. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2640.
    1. Altmann GT, Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition. 1999;73(3):247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1. - PubMed
    1. Altmann GT, Kamide Y. The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 2007;57(4):502–518.
    1. Altmann GT, Mirkovic J. Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science. 2009;33(4):583–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x. - PMC - PubMed