Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun:2013:226-232.

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF SAFETY IN URBAN LEFT-TURN SCENARIOS

Affiliations

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF SAFETY IN URBAN LEFT-TURN SCENARIOS

Jeffrey D Dawson et al. Proc Int Driv Symp Hum Factors Driv Assess Train Veh Des. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Left turns at urban intersections can be dangerous, especially when views are obstructed or pedestrians are present. Impairments in driver vision, motor, and cognition functions may further increase left-turn risk. We examined this problem in a simulated environment that included left-turn scenarios to study the driving behaviors of 28 drivers, ages 37 to 88 years, six of whom had "Useful Field of View" (UFOV) impairments. Subjects also completed a battery of neuropsychological tests. The simulated drive included an urban section with six left turns in three types of scenarios: 1) a semi truck blocking the view of oncoming traffic, 2) a lead vehicle obstruction, and 3) a pedestrian crossing ahead of the turning driver. Results showed a mean (SD) of 1.46 (1.60) collisions per driver (range 0 to 7), 83% of which occurred at intersections with semi trucks. Far visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, UFOV, Mini Mental State Examination, Trail-Making Test Part B, the Wisconsin Card Sort task, and age were all associated with the total number of collisions (Pearson correlation magnitudes between 0.37 to 0.77; p-values<0.05). Spearman correlations were less significant. Findings indicate that visual obstruction by on oncoming semi-truck is a particularly dangerous left-turn situation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Views of the Three Scenario Types. From Top to Bottom, Type 1: Semi, Type 2: Lead Vehicle, and Type 3: Pedestrian
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots, linear fit, and 95% confident bands of MMSE and WCST predicting total collisions

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen GJ, Enriquez Z. Aging and the detection of observer and moving object collisions. Psychology of Aging. 2006;21:74–85. - PubMed
    1. Ball K, Owsley C. Identifying correlates of accident involvement for the older driver. Human Factors. 1991;33:583–595. - PubMed
    1. Ball K, Owsley C, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, Bruniw JL. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1993;34:3110–3123. - PubMed
    1. Caird JK, Hancock PA. Left-turn and gap acceptance crashes. In: Dewar RE, Olson P, editors. Human factors in traffic safety. Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges Publishing; 2002.
    1. Chan C, Ragland DR, Shladover SE, Misener JA, Marco D. Observations of driver time gap acceptance at intersections in left-turn across-path-opposite-direction scenarios. Transportation Research Record. 2005;1910:10–19.

LinkOut - more resources