Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Oct 15;3(4):458-75.
doi: 10.3390/plants3040458.

Plant Responses to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stress: Molecular Mechanisms

Affiliations
Review

Plant Responses to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stress: Molecular Mechanisms

Ines Ben Rejeb et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Plants are constantly confronted to both abiotic and biotic stresses that seriously reduce their productivity. Plant responses to these stresses are complex and involve numerous physiological, molecular, and cellular adaptations. Recent evidence shows that a combination of abiotic and biotic stress can have a positive effect on plant performance by reducing the susceptibility to biotic stress. Such an interaction between both types of stress points to a crosstalk between their respective signaling pathways. This crosstalk may be synergistic and/or antagonistic and include among others the involvement of phytohormones, transcription factors, kinase cascades, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). In certain cases, such crosstalk can lead to a cross-tolerance and enhancement of a plant's resistance against pathogens. This review aims at giving an insight into cross-tolerance between abiotic and biotic stress, focusing on the molecular level and regulatory pathways.

Keywords: abiotic stress; biotic stress; cross-tolerance; plant hormones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Abiotic stress can enhance the expression of specific transcription factors (TFs) like C-repeat Binding Factors (CBF), No Apical meristem ATAF and Cup-Shaped Cotyledon (NAC), MYB mediated by abscisic acid (ABA). Although the exact role of ABA in plant pathogen interactions is still a matter of debate, in some specific cases it has been shown to promote resistance against biotic stress following abiotic stress. This is attributed to the over-expression of TFs inducing the up-regulation of PR genes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Elements possibly involved in cross-tolerance between biotic and abiotic stress. Both biotic and abiotic stress have to be first sensed by the plant cell, and then the information is transduced to appropriate downstream-located pathway(s). Sensors as well as signal transducers might be shared by both types of stressors. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and Ca++ are known among others to play a prominent role as transducers (messengers) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) cascades have been shown to be used by both types of stresses. MAPKs are centrally positioned in Ca2+-ROS crosstalk as well as in the signal output after exposure to a specific stress. The importance of ROS has repeatedly been described for both types of stresses too, and, therefore, ROS might represent crucial elements in the integration of both stresses during cross-tolerance. Plant hormone signaling is of utter importance for stress adaptation. While abscisic acid (ABA) is predominantly involved in abiotic stress adaptation, salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonate/ethylene (JA/ET) are more responsible for the plant’s reaction to biotic stress. However, there is a tremendous amount of crosstalk taking place between the various hormonal pathways, and the exact nature of this crosstalk during simultaneous biotic and abiotic stress remains to be investigated. ABA signaling contributes positively to pre-invasion defense and is responsible for enhancing callose deposition. ABA presents a positive interaction with JA/ET signaling. The activation of SA signaling by pathogen challenge can attenuate ABA responses. ABA signaling negatively affects signals that trigger systemic acquired resistance, enhancing pathogen spread from the initial site of infection. The interaction of SA, JA, and ET signaling results in increased resistance to pathogens. Hormones, secondary metabolites, priming agents, and further chemicals located in the cytoplasm finally up-regulate transcription factors (TF), pathogenesis related (PR) and defense genes, heat shock protein (HSP) genes, and further genes involved in protection against stress and thus lead to the phenotypic expression known as cross-tolerance. Arrows: induction; flat-ended lines: repression.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heil M., Bostock R.M. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences. Ann. Bot. 2002;89:503–512. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf076. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swarbrick P.J., Schulze-Lefert P., Scholes J.D. Metabolic consequences of susceptibility and resistance in barley leaves challenged with powdery mildew. Plant Cell Environ. 2006;29:1061–1076. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01472.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolton M.V. Primary metabolism and plant defense-Fuel for the fire. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2009;22:487–497. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-5-0487. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Massad T.J., Dyer L.A., Vega C.G. Cost of defense and a test of the carbon-nutrient balance and growth-differentation balance hypotheses for two co-occurring classes of plant defense. PLoS One. 2012;7:e7554. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shao H.B., Chu L.Y., Jaleel C.A., Zhao C.X. Water-deficit stress—Induced anatomical changes in higher plants. C. R. Biol. 2008;331:215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.01.002. - DOI - PubMed