Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Jul 20;34(21):2460-7.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.8931. Epub 2016 May 2.

Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study

Rita Nanda et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibition has been demonstrated to be an effective anticancer strategy. Several lines of evidence support the study of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We assessed the safety and antitumor activity of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with advanced TNBC.

Methods: KEYNOTE-012 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01848834) was a multicenter, nonrandomized phase Ib trial of single-agent pembrolizumab given intravenously at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks to patients with advanced PD-L1-positive (expression in stroma or ≥ 1% of tumor cells by immunohistochemistry) TNBC, gastric cancer, urothelial cancer, and head and neck cancer. This report focuses on the TNBC cohort.

Results: Among 111 patients with TNBC whose tumor samples were screened for PD-L1 expression, 58.6% had PD-L1-positive tumors. Thirty-two women (median age, 50.5 years; range, 29 to 72 years) were enrolled and assessed for safety and antitumor activity. The median number of doses administered was five (range, 1 to 36 doses). Common toxicities were mild and similar to those observed in other tumor cohorts (eg, arthralgia, fatigue, myalgia, and nausea), and included five (15.6%) patients with grade ≥ 3 toxicity and one treatment-related death. Among the 27 patients who were evaluable for antitumor activity, the overall response rate was 18.5%, the median time to response was 17.9 weeks (range, 7.3 to 32.4 weeks), and the median duration of response was not yet reached (range, 15.0 to ≥ 47.3 weeks).

Conclusion: This phase Ib study describes preliminary evidence of clinical activity and a potentially acceptable safety profile of pembrolizumab given every 2 weeks to patients with heavily pretreated, advanced TNBC. A single-agent phase II study examining a 200-mg dose given once every 3 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02447003) is ongoing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Antitumor activity of pembrolizumab based on RECIST v1.1 assessed by central review. (A) Best percentage change from baseline in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. (B) Longitudinal change from baseline in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. (C) Time to and durability of response. For each panel, only patients who received at least one pembrolizumab dose and who had evaluable tumor measurements based on RECIST v1.1 assessed by central review at baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment were included (n = 24). Reasons for treatment discontinuation in patients whose change from baseline per RECIST v1.1 by central review was ≤ 20% are indicated; because patients were managed by investigator assessment, reasons for discontinuation are based on RECIST v1.1 by investigator review. In panel C, length of bars equals time to last imaging assessment by central review. RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) progression-free survival based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 assessed by central review and (B) overall survival.

References

    1. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS: Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 363:1938–1948,2010 - PubMed
    1. Dent R Trudeau M Pritchard KI, etal: Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13:4429–4434,2007 - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society : American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2013-2014 2013. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society
    1. Rakha EA Elsheikh SE Aleskandarany MA, etal: Triple-negative breast cancer: Distinguishing between basal and nonbasal subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 15:2302–2310,2009 - PubMed
    1. Gucalp A, Traina TA: Triple-negative breast cancer: Adjuvant therapeutic options. Chemother Res Pract 2011:696208,2011 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data