Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 17;113(20):5588-91.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521727113. Epub 2016 May 2.

Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage

Affiliations

Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage

Katherine A DeCelles et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

We posit that the modern airplane is a social microcosm of class-based society, and that the increasing incidence of "air rage" can be understood through the lens of inequality. Research on inequality typically examines the effects of relatively fixed, macrostructural forms of inequality, such as socioeconomic status; we examine how temporary exposure to both physical and situational inequality, induced by the design of environments, can foster antisocial behavior. We use a complete set of all onboard air rage incidents over several years from a large, international airline to test our predictions. Physical inequality on airplanes-that is, the presence of a first class cabin-is associated with more frequent air rage incidents in economy class. Situational inequality-boarding from the front (requiring walking through the first class cabin) versus the middle of the plane-also significantly increases the odds of air rage in both economy and first class. We show that physical design that highlights inequality can trigger antisocial behavior on airplanes. More broadly, these results point to the importance of considering the design of environments-from airplanes to office layouts to stadium seating-in understanding both the form and emergence of antisocial behavior.

Keywords: air rage; antisocial behavior; physical inequality; situational inequality; social class.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Reuters Air rage becoming more common, due to airlines’ shrinking seats. 2015 Available at fortune.com/2015/04/16/air-rage-becoming-more-common/. Accessed November 1, 2015.
    1. Rosenbloom S. A recipe for air rage. New York Times. September 28, 2014 Available at www.nytimes.com/2014/09/28/travel/a-recipe-for-air-rage.html?_r=0. Accessed November 1, 2015.
    1. Penzenstadler N. FAA rarely wields hefty penalty hammer with air rage. USA Today. February 2, 2015 Available at www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/01/30/faa-big-fines-rare-in-air-rage-ca.... Accessed December 12, 2015.
    1. Miller PA, Eisenberg N. The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):324–344. - PubMed
    1. Durkheim E. The Division of Labor in Society. The Free Press; New York: 1933.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources