Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 30;4(2):1214.
doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1214. eCollection 2016.

The Future of Patient Engagement in the Governance of Shared Data

Affiliations

The Future of Patient Engagement in the Governance of Shared Data

Carolyn Petersen. EGEMS (Wash DC). .

Abstract

Background: The emerging health care system increasingly values patient engagement and shared decision-making between patients and their providers. The practice of these values is gaining importance as the patient-centered medical home model and personalized medicine come into greater use.

Opportunity for improvement: Exploration of patient preferences about personal health data use for research and quality improvement is a fundamental element of the provider-patient relationship. Giving patients an explicit opportunity to discuss their options about use of their data and implementing a process that allows patients to receive desired communications about how their information is used can help build patient trust, a requirement for successful care partnerships.

Practice advancement: Working to change organizational cultures that exclude patients from participation in important decisions related to personal health information use promotes a strong patient-provider relationship and, ultimately, lays the foundation for improved health care through expanded use of patient data.

Keywords: data collection; decision making; organizational innovation; patient engagement; patient-centered care; patient-centered outcomes research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B, Roden DM, Williams MS, Wilson R, Bick D, Bottinger EP, Brilliant MH, Eng C, Frazer KA, Korf B, Ledbetter DH, Lupski JR, Marsh C, Mrazek D, Murray MF, O’Donnell PH, Rader DJ, Relling MV, Shuldiner AR, Valle D, Weinshilboum R, Green ED, Ginsburg GS. “Implementing Genomic Medicine in the Clinic: The Future Is Here.”. Genetics in Medicine. 2013;15(4):258–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. David SP, Johnson SG, Berger AC, Feero WG, Terry SF, Green LA, Phillips RL, Ginsburg GS. “Making Personalized Health Care Even More Personalized: Insights From Activities of the IOM Genomics Roundtable.”. Annals of Family Medicine. 2015;13(4):373–380. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program . National Institutes of Health; 2015. Accessed Jan 5, 2016 from http://www.nih.gov/precision-medicine-initiative-cohort-program.
    1. Gray SW, Hicks-Courant K, Lathan CS, Garraway L, Park ER, Weeks JC. “Attitudes of Patients With Cancer About Personalized Medicine and Somatic Genetic Testing.”. Journal of Oncology Practice. 2012;8:329–335. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brédart A, Kop JL, DePauw A, Caron O, Sultan S, Leblond D, Buecher B, Gauthier-Villars M, Noguès C, Flahault C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S. “Short-Term Psychological Impact of the BRCA1/2 Test Result in Women with Breast Cancer According to Their Perceived Probability of Genetic Predisposition to Cancer.”. British Journal of Cancer. 2013;108:1012–1020. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources