Overcoming translational barriers impeding development of Alzheimer's disease modifying therapies

Abstract

It has now been ~ 30 years since the Alzheimer's disease (AD) research entered what may be termed the 'molecular era' that began with the identification of the amyloid β protein (Aβ) as the primary component of amyloid within senile plaques and cerebrovascular amyloid and the microtubule-associated protein tau as the primary component of neurofibrillary tangles in the AD brain. These pivotal discoveries and the subsequent genetic, pathological, and modeling studies supporting pivotal roles for tau and Aβ aggregation and accumulation have provided firm rationale for a new generation of AD therapies designed not to just provide symptomatic benefit, but as disease modifying agents that would slow or even reverse the disease course. Indeed, over the last 20 years numerous therapeutic strategies for disease modification have emerged, been preclinically validated, and advanced through various stages of clinical testing. Unfortunately, no therapy has yet to show significant clinical disease modification. In this review, I describe 10 translational barriers to successful disease modification, highlight current efforts addressing some of these barriers, and discuss how the field could focus future efforts to overcome barriers that are not major foci of current research efforts. Seminal discoveries made over the past 25 years have provided firm rationale for a new generation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapies designed as disease modifying agents that would slow or even reverse the disease course. Unfortunately, no therapy has yet to show significant clinical disease modification. In this review, I describe 10 translational barriers to successful AD disease modification, highlight current efforts addressing some of these barriers, and discuss how the field could focus future efforts to overcome these barriers. This article is part of the 60th Anniversary special issue.

Keywords: Alzheimer's Disease; amyloid; biomarkers; prevention; tau; therapeutics.

Figure 1.. A schematic of a modified and update amyloid cascade hypothesis.

This hypothesis differs from the original cascade hypothesis (Hardy & Selkoe 2002) in that it i) accounts for the contribution different forms of AB aggregates, II) it recognizes that downstream events leading to brain organ failure are not necessarily liner nor are they well understood, iii) that once a certain level of damage has occurred the downstream mediators of neurodegeneration may no longer be dependent on the triggering AB proteinopathy.