Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr 8;113(14):235-41.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0235.

Radiotherapy and Hormone Treatment in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Radiotherapy and Hormone Treatment in Prostate Cancer

Dirk Böhmer et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. .

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer has the highest incidence of any type of cancer in Germany; an estimated 67 000 new diagnoses of prostate cancer will be made in 2016. In the current German S3 guideline for the treatment of prostate cancer, radiotherapy-sometimes in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-is one of the two recommended options for treatment with curative intent (the other is radical prostatectomy). There have been many publications on this subject, yet it is still often unclear in routine practice how ADT should be administered, and for how long.

Methods: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search, with special attention to controlled trials.

Results: For low risk patients, radiotherapy without ADT is indicated (evidence level 1). Patients with localized prostate cancer and an intermediate risk benefit from radiotherapy combined with a four-to-six-month course of ADT. In this situation, a higher radiation dose might be an effective substitute for ADT (evidence level 1-2). For patients at high risk, radiotherapy combined with long-term hormonal treatment is the standard therapy, as it significantly improves all oncological end points (evidence level 1). For example, in the largest randomized and controlled trial, this form of treatment reduced cancer-specific mortality from 19% to 9% . Higher radiation doses of 66-74 Gy and longer ADT can improve local control at the cost of increased urethral toxicity.

Conclusion: Androgen deprivation combined with external beam radiotherapy is a curative standard option for patients with prostate cancer who are at high risk of recurrence. The modern radiotherapeutic techniques that are now available, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, enable a further improvement of the risk/benefit ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Avoid Downplaying Side Effects.
    Jongen J, Kahlke V, Petersen S. Jongen J, et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Oct 7;113(40):678. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0678a. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016. PMID: 27788753 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krebs in Deutschland. 10th edition. Saarbrücken: 2015. Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e. V. und das Robert-Koch-Institut.
    1. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (eds.) Version 3.1. 2014. Interdisziplinäre Leitlinie der Qualität S3 zur Früherkennung, Diagnose und Therapie der verschiedenen Stadien des Prostatakarzinoms.
    1. Konaka H, Egawa S, Saito S, et al. Tri-Modality therapy with I-125 brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and short- or long-term hormone therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer (TRIP): study protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2012;12 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014;65:124–137. - PubMed
    1. Allen AM, Pawlicki T, Dong L, et al. An evidence based review of proton beam therapy: the report of ASTRO’s emerging technology committee. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:8–11. - PubMed

Substances