Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance
- PMID: 27148323
- PMCID: PMC4840675
- DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00500
Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance
Abstract
Cotton has lost many ancestral defensive traits against key invertebrate pests. This is suggested by the levels of resistance to some pests found in wild cotton genotypes as well as in cultivated landraces and is a result of domestication and a long history of targeted breeding for yield and fiber quality, along with the capacity to control pests with pesticides. Genetic modification (GM) allowed integration of toxins from a bacteria into cotton to control key Lepidopteran pests. Since the mid-1990s, use of GM cotton cultivars has greatly reduced the amount of pesticides used in many cotton systems. However, pests not controlled by the GM traits have usually emerged as problems, especially the sucking bug complex. Control of this complex with pesticides often causes a reduction in beneficial invertebrate populations, allowing other secondary pests to increase rapidly and require control. Control of both sucking bug complex and secondary pests is problematic due to the cost of pesticides and/or high risk of selecting for pesticide resistance. Deployment of host plant resistance (HPR) provides an opportunity to manage these issues in GM cotton systems. Cotton cultivars resistant to the sucking bug complex and/or secondary pests would require fewer pesticide applications, reducing costs and risks to beneficial invertebrate populations and pesticide resistance. Incorporation of HPR traits into elite cotton cultivars with high yield and fiber quality offers the potential to further reduce pesticide use and increase the durability of pest management in GM cotton systems. We review the challenges that the identification and use of HPR against invertebrate pests brings to cotton breeding. We explore sources of resistance to the sucking bug complex and secondary pests, the mechanisms that control them and the approaches to incorporate these defense traits to commercial cultivars.
Keywords: Gossypium; arthropod control; genetic resistance; plant breeding; plant defense mechanisms; resistance traits.
Similar articles
-
The Past, Present, and Future of Host Plant Resistance in Cotton: An Australian Perspective.Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jul 6;13:895877. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895877. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35873986 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future.J Invertebr Pathol. 2015 Nov;132:1-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 27. J Invertebr Pathol. 2015. PMID: 26225455 Review.
-
Pest susceptibility, yield and fiber traits of transgenic cotton cultivars in Multan, Pakistan.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 21;15(7):e0236340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236340. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. Retraction in: PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0277604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277604. PMID: 32692775 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Benefits of Bt cotton counterbalanced by secondary pests? Perceptions of ecological change in China.Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Feb;173(1-4):985-94. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1439-y. Epub 2010 May 2. Environ Monit Assess. 2011. PMID: 20437270
-
Cotton Breeding in Australia: Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century.Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 13;13:904131. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.904131. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35646011 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Past, Present, and Future of Host Plant Resistance in Cotton: An Australian Perspective.Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jul 6;13:895877. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895877. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35873986 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Core Collections: Is There Any Value for Cotton Breeding?Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 28;13:895155. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895155. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 35574064 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Constitutive and induced insect resistance in RNAi-mediated ultra-low gossypol cottonseed cotton.BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1921-9. BMC Plant Biol. 2019. PMID: 31319793 Free PMC article.
-
Pyramiding of cry toxins and methanol producing genes to increase insect resistance in cotton.GM Crops Food. 2021 Jan 2;12(1):382-395. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2021.1944013. GM Crops Food. 2021. PMID: 34193022 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial Microbiota of Field-Collected Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Transgenic Bt and Non-Bt Cotton.Microorganisms. 2021 Apr 20;9(4):878. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040878. Microorganisms. 2021. PMID: 33923893 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adjei-Maafo I. K., Wilson L. T. (1983). Factors affecting the relative abundance of arthropods on nectaried and nectariless cotton. Environ. Entomol. 12 349–352. 10.1093/ee/12.2.349 - DOI
-
- Allen C. T. (2008). “Boll weevil eradication: an areawide pest management effort,” in Areawide Pest Management: Theory and Implementation, eds Koul O., Cuperus G., Elliot N. (Wallingfor: CABI; ), 467–559.
-
- Anthony W. S., Rayburn S. T. (1989). Cleanability of smooth- and hairy-leaf cottons - quality effects. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 32 1127–1130. 10.13031/2013.31122 - DOI
-
- Auld D. L., Bechere E., Krifa M., Kebede H., Hequet E., Wright R., et al. (2007). Registration of ‘Raider 276’, a high-yielding, improved-quality upland mutant cotton cultivar. J. Plant Regist. 1 115–116. 10.3198/jpr2007.01.0059crc - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources