Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;18(12):1308-1311.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.45. Epub 2016 May 5.

Family health history reporting is sensitive to small changes in wording

Liam S Conway-Pearson  1 , Kurt D Christensen  2   3 , Sarah K Savage  4 , Noelle L Huntington  5   6 , Elissa R Weitzman  6   7   8 , Sonja I Ziniel  6   7   9 , Phoebe Bacon  10 , Cara N Cacioppo  4 , Robert C Green  2   3   11 , Ingrid A Holm  4   6   12
Affiliations

Family health history reporting is sensitive to small changes in wording

Liam S Conway-Pearson et al. Genet Med. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Family health history is often collected through single-item queries that ask patients whether their family members are affected by certain conditions. The specific wording of these queries may influence what individuals report.

Methods: Parents of Boston Children's Hospital patients were invited to participate in a Web-based survey about the return of individual genomic research results regarding their children. Participants reported whether 11 types of medical conditions affected them or their family. Randomization determined whether participants were specifically instructed to consider their extended family.

Results: Family health history was reported by 2,901 participants. Those asked to consider their extended family were more likely to report a positive family history for 8 of 11 medical conditions. The largest differences were observed for cancer (65.1 vs. 45.7%; P < 0.001), cardiovascular conditions (72.5 vs. 56.0%; P < 0.001), and endocrine/hormonal conditions (50.9 vs. 36.7%; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Small alterations to the way family health history queries are worded can substantially change patient responses. Clinicians and researchers need to be sensitive about patients' tendencies to omit extended family from health history reporting unless specifically asked to consider them.Genet Med 18 12, 1308-1311.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Berg AO, Baird MA, Botkin JR, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference statement: family history and improving health. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(12):872–877. - PubMed
    1. Bennett RL. The family medical history as a tool in preconception consultation. J Community Genet. 2012;3(3):175–183. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wattendorf DJ, Hadley DW. Family history: the three-generation pedigree. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(3):441–448. - PubMed
    1. Bruen BK, Ku L, Lu X, Shin P. No evidence that primary care physicians offer less care to Medicaid, community health center, or uninsured patients. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(9):1624–1630. - PubMed
    1. Wilson B, Qureshi N, Little J, et al. Clinical utility of cancer family history collection in primary care. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2009;(179):1–94. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types