Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 May 6;2016(5):CD007495.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007495.pub2.

Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions

Victoria Tzortziou Brown  1 , Martin Underwood, Noman Mohamed, Olwyn Westwood, Dylan Morrissey
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions

Victoria Tzortziou Brown et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal conditions require particular management skills. Identification of interventions which are effective in equipping general practitioners (GPs) with such necessary skills could translate to improved health outcomes for patients and reduced healthcare and societal costs.

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of professional interventions for GPs that aim to improve the management of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), 2010, Issue 2; MEDLINE, Ovid (1950 - October 2013); EMBASE, Ovid (1980 - Ocotber 2013); CINAHL, EbscoHost (1980 - November 2013), and the EPOC Specialised Register. We conducted cited reference searches using ISI Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar; and handsearched selected issues of Arthritis and Rheumatism and Primary Care-Clinics in Office Practice. The latest search was conducted in November 2013.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITS) studies of professional interventions for GPs, taking place in a community setting, aiming to improve the management (including diagnosis and treatment) of musculoskeletal conditions and reporting any objective measure of GP behaviour, patient or economic outcomes. We considered professional interventions of any length, duration, intensity and complexity compared with active or inactive controls.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently abstracted all data. We calculated the risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR) of compliance with desired practice for dichotomous outcomes, and the mean difference (MD) and standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes. We investigated whether the direction of the targeted behavioural change affects the effectiveness of interventions.

Main results: Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria.From 11 studies on osteoporosis, meta-analysis of five studies (high-certainty evidence) showed that a combination of a GP alerting system on a patient's increased risk of osteoporosis and a patient-directed intervention (including patient education and a reminder to see their GP) improves GP behaviour with regard to diagnostic bone mineral density (BMD) testing and osteoporosis medication prescribing (RR 4.44; (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.54 to 5.55; 3 studies; 3,386 participants)) for BMD and RR 1.71 (95% CI 1.50 to 1.94; 5 studies; 4,223 participants) for osteoporosis medication. Meta-analysis of two studies showed that GP alerting on its own also probably improves osteoporosis guideline-consistent GP behaviour (RR 4.75 (95% CI 3.62 to 6.24; 3,047 participants)) for BMD and RR 1.52 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.84; 3.047 participants) for osteoporosis medication) and that adding the patient-directed component probably does not lead to a greater effect (RR 0.94 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.09; 2,995 participants)) for BMD and RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.10; 2,995 participants) for osteoporosis medication.Of the 10 studies on low back pain, seven showed that guideline dissemination and educational opportunities for GPs may lead to little or no improvement with regard to guideline-consistent GP behaviour. Two studies showed that the combination of guidelines and GP feedback on the total number of investigations requested may have an effect on GP behaviour and result in a slight reduction in the number of tests, while one of these studies showed that the combination of guidelines and GP reminders attached to radiology reports may result in a small but sustained reduction in the number of investigation requests.Of the four studies on osteoarthritis, one study showed that using educationally influential physicians may result in improvement in guideline-consistent GP behaviour. Another study showed slight improvements in patient outcomes (pain control) after training GPs on pain management.Of three studies on shoulder pain, one study reported that there may be little or no improvement in patient outcomes (functional capacity) after GP education on shoulder pain and injection training.Of two studies on other musculoskeletal conditions, one study on pain management showed that there may be worse patient outcomes (pain control) after GP training on the use of validated assessment scales.The 12 remaining studies across all musculoskeletal conditions showed little or no improvement in GP behaviour and patient outcomes.The direction of the targeted behaviour (i.e. increasing or decreasing a behaviour) does not seem to affect the effectiveness of an intervention. The majority of the studies did not investigate the potential adverse effects of the interventions and only three studies included a cost-effectiveness analysis.Overall, there were important methodological limitations in the body of evidence, with just a third of the studies reporting adequate allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessments. While our confidence in the pooled effect estimate of interventions for improving diagnostic testing and medication prescribing in osteoporosis is high, our confidence in the reported effect estimates in the remaining studies is low.

Authors' conclusions: There is good-quality evidence that a GP alerting system with or without patient-directed education on osteoporosis improves guideline-consistent GP behaviour, resulting in better diagnosis and treatment rates.Interventions such as GP reminder messages and GP feedback on performance combined with guideline dissemination may lead to small improvements in guideline-consistent GP behaviour with regard to low back pain, while GP education on osteoarthritis pain and the use of educationally influential physicians may lead to slight improvement in patient outcomes and guideline-consistent behaviour respectively. However, further studies are needed to ascertain the effectiveness of such interventions in improving GP behaviour and patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Victoria Tzortziou Brown: None to declare

Martin Underwood: None to declare

Noman Mohamed: None to declare

Olwyn Westwood: None to declare

Dylan Morrissey: None to declare

Figures

1
1
Prisma study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Risk of bias summary for ITS study design: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
5
5
Risk of bias graph for ITS study design: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Meta‐analysis of osteoporosis studies evaluating physician and patient interventions versus usual care, Outcome 1 Bone Mineral Density.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Meta‐analysis of osteoporosis studies evaluating physician and patient interventions versus usual care, Outcome 2 Osteoporosis medication.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Meta‐analysis of osteoporosis studies evaluating physician‐only interventions versus usual care, Outcome 1 Bone mineral density.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Meta‐analysis of osteoporosis studies evaluating physician‐only interventions versus usual care, Outcome 2 Osteoporosis medication.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Meta‐analysis of osteoporosis studies evaluating physician only interventions versus physician and patient interventions, Outcome 1 Bone mineral density.
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Meta‐analysis of osteoporosis studies evaluating physician only interventions versus physician and patient interventions, Outcome 2 Medication.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Becker 2008 {published data only}
    1. Becker A, Leonhardt C, Kochen MM, Keller S, Wegscheider K, Baum E, et al. Effects of two guideline implementation strategies on patient outcomes in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine 2008;33(5):473‐80. - PubMed
Bessette 2011 {published data only}
    1. Bessette L, Davison KS, Jean S, Roy S, Ste‐Marie LG, Brown JP. The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population‐based randomized controlled trial. Osteoporosis International 2011;22(12):2963‐72. - PubMed
Bishop 2006 {published data only}
    1. Bishop PB, Wing PC. Knowledge transfer in family physicians managing patients with acute low back pain: a prospective randomized control trial. Spine J 2006;6(3):282‐8. - PubMed
Boyd 2002 {published data only}
    1. Boyd JL, Holcomb JP, Rothenberg RJ. Physician treatment of osteoporosis in response to heel ultrasound bone mineral density reports. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 2002;5(4):375‐81. - PubMed
Broadhurst 2007 {published data only}
    1. Broadhurst NA, Barton CA, Rowett D, Yelland L, Matin DK, Gialamas A, et al. A before and after study of the impact of academic detailing on the use of diagnostic imaging for shoulder complaints in general practice. BMC Family Practice 2007;8:12. - PMC - PubMed
Chassany 2006 {published data only}
    1. Chassany O, Boureau F, Liard F, Bertin P, Serrie A, Ferran P, et al. Effects of training on general practitioners' management of pain in osteoarthritis: a randomized multicenter study. Journal of Rheumatology 2006;33(9):1827‐34. - PubMed
Ciaschini 2010 {published data only}
    1. Ciaschini PM, Straus SE, Dolovich LR, Goeree RA, Leung KM, Woods CR, et al. Community based intervention to optimize osteoporosis management: randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics 2010;10:60. - PMC - PubMed
Cranney 2008 {published data only}
    1. Cranney A, Lam M, Ruhland L, Brison R, Godwin M, Harrison MM, et al. A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with wrist fractures: a cluster randomized trial. Osteoporos International 2008;19(12):1733‐40. - PubMed
Dey 2004 {published data only}
    1. Dey P, Simpson CW, Collins SI, Hodgson G, Dowrick CF, Simison AJ, et al. Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of General Practice 2004;54(498):33‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Eccles 2001 {published data only}
    1. Eccles M, Steen N, Grimshaw J, Thomas L, McNamee P, Soutter J, et al. Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary‐care radiology referrals: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357(9266):1406‐9. - PubMed
    1. Ramsay CR, Eccles M, Grimshaw JM, Steen N. Assessing the long‐term effect of educational reminder messages on primary care radiology referrals. Clinical Radiology 2003;58(4):319‐21. - PubMed
Engers 2005 {published data only}
    1. Engerseta AJ, Wensing M, Tulder MW, Timmermans A, Oostendorp RA, Koes BW, et al. Implementation of the Dutch low back pain guideline for general practitioners: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine 2005;30(6):559‐600. - PubMed
Feldstein 2006 {published data only}
    1. Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Orwoll E, Chen C, et al. Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2006;54(3):450‐7. - PubMed
French 2013 {published data only}
    1. French SD, McKenzie JE, O'Connor DA, Grimshaw JM, Mortimer D, Francis JJ, et al. Evaluation of a theory‐informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial. PLoS ONE 2013;8(6):e65471. - PMC - PubMed
Gormley 2003 {published data only}
    1. Gormley GJ, Steele WK, Stevenson M, McKane R, Ryans I, Cairns AP, et al. A randomised study of two training programmes for general practitioners in the techniques of shoulder injection. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2003;62(10):1006‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Hazard 1997 {published data only}
    1. Hazard RG, Haugh LD, Reid S, McFarlane G, MacDonald L. Early physician notification of patient disability risk and clinical guidelines after low back injury: a randomized, controlled trial. Spine 1997;22(24):2951‐8. - PubMed
Hollingworth 2002 {published data only}
    1. Hollingworth W, Todd CJ, King H, Males T, Dixon AK, Karia KR, Kinmonth AL. Primary care referrals for lumbar spine radiography:diagnostic yield and clinical guidelines. British Jornal of General Practice 2002;52(6):475‐80. - PMC - PubMed
Huas 2006 {published data only}
    1. Huas D, Pouchain D, Gay B, Avouac B, Bouvenot G, French College Of Teachers In General Practice. Assessing chronic pain in general practice: are guidelines relevant? A cluster randomized controlled trial. European Jourmal of General Practice 2006;12(2):52‐7. - PubMed
Kerry 2000 {published data only}
    1. Kerry S, Oakeshott P, Dundas D, Williams J. Influence of postal distribution of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X‐ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Family Practice 2000;17(1):46‐52. - PubMed
Lafata 2007 {published data only}
    1. Lafata JE, Kolk D, Peterson EL, McCarthy BD, Weiss TW, Chen YT, et al. Improving osteoporosis screening:Results from a randomized cluster trial. Journal of General internal Medicine 2007;22(3):346‐51. - PMC - PubMed
Leslie 2012 {published data only}
    1. Leslie WD, LaBine L, Klassen P, Dreilich BM, Caetano P. Closing the gap in postfracture care at population level: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2012;184(3):290‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Majumdar 2008 {published data only}
    1. Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, Bellerose D, Russell AS, Hanley DA, et al. Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2008;178(5):569‐75. - PMC - PubMed
Rahme 2005 {published data only}
    1. Rahme E, Choquette D, Beaulieu M, Bessette L, Joseph L, Toubouti Y, et al. Impact of a general practitioner educational intervention on osteoarthritis treatment in an elderly population. American Journal of Medicine 2005;118(11):1262‐70. - PubMed
Robling 2002 {published data only}
    1. Robling MR, Houston HL, Kinnersley P, Hourihan MD, Cohen DR, Hale J, et al. General practitioners' use of magnetic resonance imaging: an open randomized trial comparing telephone and written requests and an open randomized controlled trial of different methods of local guideline dissemination. Clinical Radiology 2002;57(5):402‐7. - PubMed
Rosemann 2007 {published data only}
    1. Rosemann T, Joos S, Laux G, Gensichen J, Szecsenyi J. Case management of arthritis patients in primary care: a cluster‐randomized controlled trial. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2007;57(8):1390‐7. - PubMed
    1. Rosemann T, Korner T, Wensing M, Genzichen J, Muth C, Joos S, et al. Rationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a primary care based intervention to improve the quality of life of osteoarthritis patients. The PraxArt‐project: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2005;5(19):77. - PMC - PubMed
Roux 2013 {published data only}
    1. Roux S, Beaulieu M, Beaulieu MC, Cabana F, Boire G. Priming primary care physicians to treat osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: an integrated multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Rheumatology 2013;40(5):703‐11. - PubMed
Rozental 2008 {published data only}
    1. Rozental TD, Makhni EC, Day CS, Bouxsein ML. Improving evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis following distal radial fractures. A prospective randomized intervention. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American 2008;90(5):953‐61. - PubMed
Schectman 2003 {published data only}
    1. Schectman JM, Schroth WS, Verme D, Voss JD. Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2003;18(10):773‐80. - PMC - PubMed
Solomon 2007a {published data only}
    1. Shu AD, Stedman MR, Polinski JM, Jan S, Patel M, Truppo C, et al. Adherence to osteoporosis medications after patient and physician brief education: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Managed Care 2009;15(7):417‐24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solomon DH, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Polinski JM, Stedman M, Brookhart MA, et al. Osteoporosis improvement: a large‐scale randomized controlled trial of patient and primary care physician education. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2007;22(11):1808‐15. - PubMed
Stross 1985 {published data only}
    1. Stross JK, Bole GG. Evaluation of an educational program for primary care practitioners, on the management of osteoarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1985;28(1):108‐11. - PubMed
Watson 2008 {published data only}
    1. McKenna C, Bojke L, Manca A, Adebajo A, Dickson J, Helliwell P, et al. Shoulder acute pain in primary health care: is retraining GPs effective? The SAPPHIRE randomized trial: a cost‐effectiveness analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48(5):558‐63. - PubMed
    1. Watson J, Helliwell P, Morton V, Adebajo A, Dickson J, Russell I, et al. Shoulder acute pain in primary healthcare: is retraining effective for GP principals? SAPPHIRE‐‐a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47(12):1795‐802. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Ashe 2004 {published data only}
    1. Ashe M, Khan K, Guy P, Kruse K, Hughes K, O'brien P, et al. Wristwatch‐distal radial fracture as a marker for osteoporosis investigation: a controlled trial of patient education and a physician alerting system. Journal of Hand Therapy 2004;17(3):324‐8. - PubMed
Corson 2011 {published data only}
    1. Corson K, Doak MN, Denneson L, Crutchfield M, Soleck G, Dickinson KC, et al. Primary care clinician adherence to guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain: results from the study of the effectiveness of a collaborative approach to pain. Pain Medicine 2011;12(10):1490‐501. - PubMed
Fabiani 2004 {published data only}
    1. Fabiani L, Giovannoni S, Casanica M, Scatigna M, Pulsoni R, Ventriglia G, et al. Efficiency of guidelines and educational program: a training process for the diagnosis of low back pain. Recenti Progressi in Medicina 2004;95(2):81‐6. - PubMed
Feldstein 2007 {published data only}
    1. Feldstein AC, Vollmer WM, Smith DH, Petrik A, Schneider J, Glauber H, et al. An outreach program improved osteoporosis management after a fracture. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2007;55(9):1464‐9. - PubMed
Garala 1999 {published data only}
    1. Garala M, Craig J, Lee J. Reducing general practitioner referral for lumbar spine X‐ray. Journal of Clinical Governance 1999;7(4):186‐9.
Gardner 2002 {published data only}
    1. Gardner MJ, Flik KR, Mooar P, Lane JM. Improvement in the undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American 2002;84‐A(8):1342‐8. - PubMed
Gardner 2005 {published data only}
    1. Gardner MJ, Brophy RH, Demetrakopoulos D, Koob J, Hong R, Rana A, et al. Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American 2005;87(1):3‐7. - PubMed
Glazier 2005 {published data only}
    1. Glazier RH, Badley EM, Lineker SC, Wilkins AL, Bell MJ. Getting a Grip on Arthritis: an educational intervention for the diagnosis and treatment of arthritis in primary care. Journal of Rheumatology 2005;32(1):137‐42. - PubMed
Goldberg 2001 {published data only}
    1. Goldberg HI, Deyo RA, Taylor VM, Cheadle AD, Conrad DA, Loeser JD, et al. Can evidence change the rate of back surgery? A randomized trial of community‐based education. Effective Clinical Practice 2001;4(3):95‐104. - PubMed
Ioannidis 2008 {published data only}
    1. Ioannidis G, Thabane L, Gafni A, Hodsman A, Kvern B, Johnstone D, et al. Optimizing care in osteoporosis: the Canadian quality circle project. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:130. - PMC - PubMed
Ioannidis 2009 {published data only}
    1. Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Thabane L, Gafni A, Hodsman A, Kvern B, et al. The utilization of appropriate osteoporosis medications improves following a multifaceted educational intervention: The Canadian quality circle project (CQC). BMC Medical Education 2009;9:1. - PMC - PubMed
McDonald 2003 {published data only}
    1. McDonald PK, Winkle CA, Askew D. Evaluation of academic detailing within a coordinated care trial. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research 2003;33(2):114‐6.
Nazareth 2002 {published data only}
    1. Nazareth I, Freemantle N, Duggan C, Mason J, Haines A. Evaluation of a complex intervention for changing professional behaviour: the Evidence Based Out Reach (EBOR) Trial. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2002;7(4):230‐8. - PubMed
Rolfe 2001 {published data only}
    1. Rolfe MK. The NEBPINY programme (Phase 1). Changing practice ‐‐ testing a facilitated evidence‐based programme in primary care. Journal of Clinical Governance 2001;9(1):21‐6.
Ruiz 2001 {published data only}
    1. Ruiz Moral R, Munoz Alamo M, Alba Jurado M, Perula de Torres L. Effectiveness of a learner‐centred training programme for primary care physicians in using a patient‐centred consultation style. Family Practice 2001;18(1):60‐3. - PubMed
Solomon 2007b {published data only}
    1. Solomon DH, Polinski JM, Stedman M, Truppo C, Breiner L, Egan C, et al. Improving care of patients at‐risk for osteoporosis: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007;22(3):362‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Vernacchio 2013 {published data only}
    1. Vernacchio L, Trudell EK, Hresko MT, Karlin LI, Risko W. A quality improvement program to reduce unnecessary referrals for adolescent scoliosis. Pediatrics 2013;131(3):e912. - PubMed

Additional references

Ajit 2004
    1. Ajit KS. Invited commentary: educational interventions to address the core competencies in surgery. Surgery 2004;135(1):43‐7. - PubMed
Arthritis Research UK 2011
    1. Arthritis Research UK & the University of Manchester. A Heavy Burden: the occurrence and impact of musculoskeletal conditions in the UK today. www.inflammation‐repair.manchester.ac.uk/Musculoskeletal/aboutus/publications/heavyburden... 2011.
Badley 1994
    1. Badley EM, Rasooly I, Webster GK. Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. Journal of Rheumatology 1994;21(3):505‐14. - PubMed
Berlin 1997
    1. Berlin JA. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta‐analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta‐analysis Blinding Study Group. Lancet 1997;350(9072):185‐6. - PubMed
Bywood 2008
    1. Bywood PT, Lunnay B, Roche AM. Strategies for facilitating change in alcohol and other drugs (AOD) professional practice: a systematic review of the effectiveness of reminders and feedback. Drug and Alcohol Review 2008;27(5):548‐558. - PubMed
Deeks 2011
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011].The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
EPOC 2002
    1. Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). EPOC taxonomy. epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐methods; epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐taxonomy 2002.
EPOC 2013a
    1. Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). What study designs should be included in an EPOC review and what should they be called?. EPOC Resources for review authors; available from epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors 2013.
EPOC 2013b
    1. Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). Good practice data extraction form. EPOC Resources for review authors; available from epocoslo.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors 2013.
EPOC 2013c
    1. Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). What are exploratory factors and why should they be included in protocols?. EPOC Resources for review authors; available at epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors 2013; Vol. 2013.
EPOC 2013d
    1. Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). What outcomes should be reported in Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) reviews?. EPOC Resources for review authors; available at epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors 2013.
EPOC 2013e
    1. Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). Analysis in EPOC reviews. EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services 2013; Vol. available at epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors.
EPOC 2015
    1. Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. EPOC Resources for review authors; available at http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors 2015.
Flodgren 2011
    1. Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, Gattellari M, O'Brien MA, Grimshaw J, et al. Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Forrest 1989
    1. Forrest JM, McKenna M, Stanley IM, Boaden NT, Woodcock GT. Continuing education: a survey among general practitioners. Family Practice 1989;6(2):98‐107. - PubMed
French 2010
    1. French SD, Green S, Buchbinder R, Barnes H. Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006094.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Giguere 2012
    1. Giguère A, Légaré F, Grimshaw J, Turcotte S, Fiander M, Grudniewicz A, et al. Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grimshaw 2004
    1. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment 2004;8(6):1‐72. - PubMed
Guyatt 2008
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck‐Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: what is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ 2008;336(7651):995‐8.. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011].The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration.
Ivers 2012
    1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard‐Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Jones 1998
    1. Jones JR, Hodgson JT, Clegg TA, Elliott RC. Self‐reported Work‐Related Illness in 1995. Results from a Household Survey. www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/2002/swi95.pdf. London: Health and Safety Executive, 1998.
Jordan 2007
    1. Jordan K, Clarke AM, Symmons DP, Fleming D, Porcheret M, Kadam UT, et al. Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases.. British Journal of General Practice 2007;57(534):7‐14. - PMC - PubMed
Klinkman 1997
    1. Klinkman MS. Competing demands in psychosocial care: a model for the identification and treatment of depressive disorders in primary care. General Hospital Psychiatry 1997;19(2):98‐111. - PubMed
Kroenke 2000
    1. Kroenke K, Taylor‐Vaisey A, Dietrich AJ, Oxman TE. Interventions to improve provider diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders in primary care: a critical review of the literature. Psychosomatics 2000;41(1):39‐52. - PubMed
Lally 2010
    1. Lally P, Jaarsveld C, Potts H, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology October 2010;40(6):998‐1009.
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Majumdar 2007
    1. Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Lier DA, Russell AS, Hanley DA, Blitz S, et al. Persistence, reproducibility and cost‐effectiveness of an intervention to improve the quality of osteoporosis care after a fracture of the wrist: results of a controlled trial.. Osteoporos International 2007;18(3):261‐70. - PubMed
McCormick 1995
    1. McCormick A, Fleming D, Charlton J. Morbidity Statistics from General Practice Fourth National Morbidity Survey 1991‐1992. London: HMSO, 1995.
McKenna 2009
    1. McKenna C, Bojke L, Manca A, Adebajo A, Dickson J, Helliwell P, Morton V, Russell I, Torgerson D, Watson J. Shoulder acute pain in primary health care: is retraining GPs effective? The SAPPHIRE randomized trial: a cost‐effectiveness analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) May 2009;48(5):558‐563. - PubMed
Michie 2011
    1. Michie S, Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science 2011;6:42. - PMC - PubMed
National Center for Health Statistics 1995
    1. National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. US Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MD 1995.
Ramsey 2003
    1. Ramsay CR, Eccles M, Grimshaw JM, Steen N. Assessing the long‐term effect of educational reminder messages on primary care radiology referrals. Clinical Radiology 2003;58:319‐321. - PubMed
RCGP 1995
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Department of Health. Morbidity Statistics from General Practice: fourth national study, 1991/92. London: HMSO, 1995.
RCGP Curriculum 2006
    1. Wise E, Leach J, Fraser A, Field S. Rheumatology and conditions of the musculoskeletal system (including trauma). Royal College of General Practitioners Curriculum Statement 15.9 January 2006.
Schünemann 2011
    1. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011].The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration.
Shemilt 2011
    1. Shemilt I, Mugford M, Byford S, Drummond M, Eisenstein E, Knapp M, et al. Chapter 15: Incorporating economics evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011].The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Smith 2009
    1. Smith H, Brown H, Khanna J. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health‐care outcomes: RHL commentary. The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization October 2009.
Smith 2016
    1. Smith SM, Wallace E, O`Dowd T, Fortin M. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016 2016;Issue 3:Art. No.: CD006560. - PMC - PubMed
Ukoumunne 1999
    1. Ukoumunne O C, Gulliford M C, Chinn S, Sterne J A, Burney P G. Methods for evaluating area‐wide andorganisation‐based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.. Health Technology Assessment 1999;3(5):iii‐92. - PubMed
Van Bokhoven 2003
    1. Bokhoven MA, Kok G, Weijden T. Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach. Quality & Safety in Health Care Jun 2003;12(3):215‐20. - PMC - PubMed
WHO 2003
    1. Akesson K, Dreinhofer KE, Woolf AD. Improved education in musculoskeletal conditions is necessary for all doctors . Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003;81(9):677‐83. - PMC - PubMed
Worker Health Chartbook 2004
    1. Department of Health and Human Sciences. Worker Health Chartbook 2004; Chapter 2, Musculoskeletal Disorders. www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004‐146/pdfs/2004‐146.pdf September 2004; Vol. NIOSH Publication No. 2004‐146.

References to other published versions of this review

Tzortziou 2008
    1. Tzortziou V, Morrissey D, Underwood M. Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007495] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances