Similar articles

• Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.

  Brinjikji W, Huston J 3rd, Rabinstein AA, Kim GM, Lerman A, Lanzino G. Brinjikji W, et al. J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):27-42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452. Epub 2015 Jul 31. J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26230478 Review.
• Assessing extracranial carotid stenosis: magnetic resonance angiography, duplex scanning, and digital angiography.

  Freeman J, Free T, Payne H, Gutnik L, Schultz G, Masterson T, Brewer M. Freeman J, et al. S D J Med. 1993 Feb;46(2):53-6. S D J Med. 1993. PMID: 8441927
• Can noninvasive studies replace conventional angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid stenosis?

  De Marco JK, Schonfeld S, Wesbey G. De Marco JK, et al. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1996 Nov;6(4):911-29. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1996. PMID: 8824140 Review.
• Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.

  Modaresi KB, Cox TC, Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Verma H, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS. Modaresi KB, et al. Br J Surg. 1999 Nov;86(11):1422-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01255.x. Br J Surg. 1999. PMID: 10583289
• [Diagnostic imaging of carotid stenosis: ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography angiography].

  Nemoto S. Nemoto S. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011 Nov;112(6):371-6. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011. PMID: 22165710 Review. Japanese.