Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 6;5(2):e56.
doi: 10.2196/resprot.5478.

Improving Rates of Influenza Vaccination Through Electronic Health Record Portal Messages, Interactive Voice Recognition Calls and Patient-Enabled Electronic Health Record Updates: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Improving Rates of Influenza Vaccination Through Electronic Health Record Portal Messages, Interactive Voice Recognition Calls and Patient-Enabled Electronic Health Record Updates: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Sarah L Cutrona et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision support (CDS), including computerized reminders for providers and patients, can improve health outcomes. CDS promoting influenza vaccination, delivered directly to patients via an electronic health record (EHR) patient portal and interactive voice recognition (IVR) calls, offers an innovative approach to improving patient care.

Objective: To test the effectiveness of an EHR patient portal and IVR outreach to improve rates of influenza vaccination in a large multispecialty group practice in central Massachusetts.

Methods: We describe a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of EHR patient portal messages and IVR calls designed to promote influenza vaccination. In our preparatory phase, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients, providers, and staff to inform development of EHR portal messages with embedded questionnaires and IVR call scripts. We also provided practice-wide education on influenza vaccines to all physicians and staff members, including information on existing vaccine-specific EHR CDS. Outreach will target adult patients who remain unvaccinated for more than 2 months after the start of the influenza season. Using computer-generated randomization and a factorial design, we will assign 20,000 patients who are active users of electronic patient portals to one of the 4 study arms: (1) receipt of a portal message promoting influenza vaccines and offering online appointment scheduling; (2) receipt of an IVR call with similar content but without appointment facilitation; (3) both (1) and (2); or (4) neither (1) nor (2) (usual care). We will randomize patients without electronic portals (10,000 patients) to (1) receipt of IVR call or (2) usual care. Both portal messages and IVR calls promote influenza vaccine completion. Our primary outcome is percentage of eligible patients with influenza vaccines administered at our group practice during the 2014-15 influenza season. Both outreach methods also solicit patient self-report on influenza vaccinations completed outside the clinic or on barriers to influenza vaccination. Self-reported data from both outreach modes will be uploaded into the EHR to increase accuracy of existing provider-directed EHR CDS (vaccine alerts).

Results: With our proposed sample size and using a factorial design, power calculations using baseline vaccination rate estimates indicated that 4286 participants per arm would give 80% power to detect a 3% improvement in influenza vaccination rates between groups (α=.05; 2-sided). Intention-to-treat unadjusted chi-square analyses will be performed to assess the impact of portal messages, either alone or in combination with the IVR call, on influenza vaccination rates. The project was funded in January 2014. Patient enrollment for the project described here completed in December 2014. Data analysis is currently under way and first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2016.

Conclusions: If successful, this study's intervention may be adapted by other large health care organizations to increase vaccination rates among their eligible patients.

Clinicaltrial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02266277; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02266277 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6fbLviHLH).

Keywords: Electronic Mail; Health Records, Personal; Internet; Medical Informatics Applications; Telephone; clinical decision support; electronic health records; influenza vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Communication Human Information Processing model [22,23].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Outreach design.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brenner Samantha K, Kaushal Rainu, Grinspan Zachary, Joyce Christine, Kim Inho, Allard Rhonda J, Delgado Diana, Abramson Erika L. Effects of health information technology on patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov 13; doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv138.ocv138 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clinical Decision Support: More Than Just 'Alerts' Tipsheet. [2015-03-24]. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentiveProg... .
    1. Cash Jared J. Alert fatigue. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Dec 1;66(23):2098–101. doi: 10.2146/ajhp090181.66/23/2098 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Sijs Heleen. Aarts Jos, Vulto Arnold, Berg Marc. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(2):138–47. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1809. http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16357358 M1809 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ridgely M. and M. Greenberg. Too many alerts, too much liability: sorting through the malpractice implications of drug-drug interaction clinical decision support. J Health Law Policy. 2012;5:257–296. http://www.slu.edu/Documents/law/SLUJHP/JHLP5-2_Ridgely_Greenberg_Articl...

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources