Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 May;18(5):400-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

Percutaneous vs. endoscopic pre-operative biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Percutaneous vs. endoscopic pre-operative biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ahmer Hameed et al. HPB (Oxford). 2016 May.

Abstract

Background: The strategy for preoperative management of biliary obstruction in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients with regards to drainage by endoscopic (EBD) or percutaneous (PTBD) methods is not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility, complications and therapeutic efficacy of these methods in HCCA patients, with a secondary aim to assess the use of portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients undergoing drainage.

Methods: Studies incorporating HCCA patients undergoing biliary drainage prior to curative resection were included (EMBASE and Medline databases). Analyses included baseline drainage data, procedure-related complications and efficacy, post-operative parameters, and meta-analyses where applicable.

Results: Fifteen studies were included, with EBD performed in 536 patients (52%). Unilateral drainage of the future liver remnant was undertaken in 94% of patients. There was a trend towards higher procedure conversion (RR 7.36, p = 0.07) and cholangitis (RR 3.36, p = 0.15) rates in the EBD group. Where specified, 134 (30%) drained patients had PVE, in association with a major hepatectomy in 131 patients (98%). Post-operative hepatic failure occurred in 22 (11%) of EBD patients compared to 56 (13%) of PTBD patients, whilst median 1-year survival in these groups was 91% and 73%, respectively.

Discussion: The accepted practice is for most jaundiced HCCA patients to have preoperative drainage of the future liver remnant. EBD may be associated with more immediate procedure-related complications, although it is certainly not inferior compared to PTBD in the long term.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flow diagram. * Depending on number of studies in which specific parameter(s) being analysed were recorded
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots generated from meta-analyses comparing EBD and PTBD with respect to: (a) post-drainage cholangitis rates; (b) conversion rates from one form of drainage procedure to the other; and (c) overall post-drainage complications. CI – confidence interval; RR – risk ratio

References

    1. Jarnagin W.R., Fong Y., DeMatteo R.P., Gonen M., Burke E.C., Bodniewicz B.S.J. Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2001;234:507–519. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Razumilava N., Gores G.J. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 2014;383:2168–2179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rerknimitr R., Kladcharoen N., Mahachai V., Kullavanijaya P. Result of endoscopic biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38:518–523. - PubMed
    1. Ito F., Cho C.S., Rikkers L.F., Weber S.M. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: current management. Ann Surg. 2009;250:210–218. - PubMed
    1. Hemming A.W., Reed A.I., Fujita S., Foley D.P., Howard R.J. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;241:693–702. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms