Implementing a "Do-Not-Resuscitate" (DNR) policy in a nursing home
- PMID: 2715562
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb05687.x
Implementing a "Do-Not-Resuscitate" (DNR) policy in a nursing home
Abstract
During implementation of a new Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) policy in New York State, decisions by 233 nursing home patients of their surrogates were evaluated. Eighteen patients with capacity (mean age +/- SD = 76.4 +/- 12.1 years) chose DNR; 30 patients with capacity (mean age +/- SD = 76.2 +/- 10.7 years) chose to be resuscitated (CODE); 54 patients without capacity, (mean age +/- SD = 86.1 +/- 9.1 years) had surrogates who chose DNR; and 131 patients without capacity and with surrogates (mean age +/- SD = 81.9 +/- 9.8 years) remained CODE. Most patients with capacity who chose DNR had multiple sclerosis, while most choosing CODE had strokes. Most patients who lacked capacity had dementia. Forty-five percent of surrogates did not respond regarding CODE status during the three-month study interval, and 10% wanted additional time to decide. Patient age appeared to be a factor in surrogate choice for DNR but not in patients with capacity making their own decision. Reasons for patients with capacity choosing DNR are discussed; perceived quality of life and premorbid feelings by patients help in the decision-making process.
Comment in
-
DNR in nursing homes: the U.K. and N.Y.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 Feb;38(2):181. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03484.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990. PMID: 2299124 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
