A comparable study of clinical and optical outcomes after 1.8, 2.0 mm microcoaxial and 3.0 mm coaxial cataract surgery
- PMID: 27158610
- PMCID: PMC4844058
- DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.03.13
A comparable study of clinical and optical outcomes after 1.8, 2.0 mm microcoaxial and 3.0 mm coaxial cataract surgery
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the clinical and optical outcomes after clear corneal incision cataract surgery (CICS) with three different incision sizes (1.8, 2.0 and 3.0 mm).
Methods: Eyes of 150 patients with age-related cataract scheduled for coaxial cataract surgery were randomized to three groups: 1.8, 2.0, or 3.0 mm CICS. Intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes including surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), the corneal incision thickness, wavefront aberrations and modulation transfer function (MTF) of cornea were obtained.
Results: There were no significant differences among the three groups in demographic characteristics and intraoperative outcome. The 1.8 and 2.0 mm microincisions showed more satisfactory clinical outcomes than the 3.0 mm incision. The 1.8 mm incision showed significantly less SIA than the 2.0 mm incision until postoperative 1mo (P<0.05), but the difference was only 0.14-0.18 D. Combined with less increased incision thickness only at postoperative 1d (P=0.013), the 1.8 mm incision presented better uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) than the 2.0 mm incision only at 1d postoperatively (P=0.008). For higher-order aberrations and other Zernike coefficients, there were no significant differences between the 1.8 mm group and 2.0 mm group (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Converting from 3.0 mm CICS to 1.8 or 2.0 mm CICS result in better clinical and optical outcomes. However, when incision is 1.8 mm, the benefits from further reduction in size compared with 2.0 mm are limited. The necessity to reduce the incision size is to be deliberated.
Keywords: microsurgery; phacoemulsification; treatment outcome.
Figures
References
-
- Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Omulecki W. Results of coaxial phacoemulsification through a 1.8 mm microincision in hard cataracts. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011;42(2):125–131. - PubMed
-
- Luo L, Lin H, He M, Congdon N, Yang Y, Liu Y. Clinical evaluation of three incision size-dependent phacoemulsification systems. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):831–839. - PubMed
-
- Vasavada V, Vasavada AR, Vasavada VA, Srivastava S, Gajjar DU, Mehta S. Incision integrity and postoperative outcomes after microcoaxial phacoemulsification performed using 2 incision-dependent systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(4):563–571. - PubMed
-
- World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Edinburgh, Scotland, 52nd general assembly, October 2000; Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm. Accessed December 8, 2008. - PubMed
-
- Jaffe NS, Clayman HM. The pathophysiology of corneal astigmatism after cataract extraction. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975;79:615–630.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous