Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Dec;70(6):963-970.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 May 6.

Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Antitumor Activity of Apalutamide (ARN-509), a Potent Androgen Receptor Antagonist, in the High-risk Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Cohort

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Antitumor Activity of Apalutamide (ARN-509), a Potent Androgen Receptor Antagonist, in the High-risk Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Cohort

Matthew R Smith et al. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Apalutamide is a potent androgen receptor (AR) antagonist that targets the AR ligand-binding domain and prevents AR nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and transcription of AR gene targets.

Objective: To evaluate the activity and safety of apalutamide in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).

Design, setting, and participants: We conducted a multicenter phase 2 study of nmCRPC patients with a high risk for progression (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥8 ng/ml or PSA doubling time [PSA DT] ≤10 mo).

Intervention: Patients received 240mg/d apalutamide while continuing on androgen-deprivation therapy.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Primary end point was 12-wk PSA response (Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria). Secondary end points included safety, time to PSA progression (TTPP), and metastasis-free survival (MFS).

Results and limitations: A total of 51 patients were enrolled; four patients with metastatic disease were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Patient characteristics included median age, 71 yr; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 (76%); Gleason score ≤7 (57%); median PSA 10.7 ng/ml; and PSA DT ≤10 mo (45%). At median follow-up of 28.0 mo, 18 patients (35%) remained in the study. Overall, 89% of patients had ≥50% PSA decline at 12 wk. Median TTPP was 24.0 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3 mo-not reached [NR]); median MFS was NR (95% CI, 33.4 mo-NR). Most of the patients discontinued study treatment (n=33) due to disease progression (n=11 [22%]) or adverse events (AEs) (n=9 [18%]). The most common AE was fatigue (any grade, n=31 [61%]) although grade ≥3 fatigue was uncommon (n=2 [4%]). These represent the first apalutamide nmCRPC patient clinical data.

Conclusions: In high-risk nmCRPC patients, apalutamide was safe with robust activity based on durable PSA responses and disease control.

Patient summary: Antitumor activity and the safety of apalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer support continued development in this setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01171898.

Keywords: Antitumor activity; Apalutamide; Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosures: Matthew R. Smith certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: Matthew R. Smith has served as a consultant to Janssen Research & Development. Emmanuel S. Antonarakis has served as a consultant/adviser to Janssen Biotech, Astellas, Medivation, ESSA, Sanofi, and Dendreon; he has received research funding from Aragon Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Biotech, Astellas, Tokai, Sanofi, Dendreon, Exelixis, Novartis, and Genentech. Charles J. Ryan has received honoraria from Janssen Research & Development. William R. Berry has received research grants from AHRQ. Neal D. Shore is a consultant/adviser to Algeta, Amgen, Bayer, BNI, Dendreon, Ferring, Janssen, Millennium, and Sanofi. Glenn Liu has nothing to report. Joshi J. Alumkal has received research funding from Aragon Pharmaceuticals. Celestia S. Higano received consulting fees or honoraria from AbbVie, Algeta, Astellas, Bayer, Dendreon, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Medivation, Novartis, Pfizer, and Veridex; grants or research support from Amgen, Aragon Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Dendreon, Exelixis, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Medivation, Millennium, Novartis, OncoGenex, Sanofi-Aventis US, Taxynergy, and Teva; and other financial benefits from Cell Therapeutics. Edna Chow Maneval was an employee at Aragon Pharmaceuticals. Rajesh Bandekar is an employee of Janssen Research & Development and holds stock and stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Carla J. de Boer is an employee of Janssen Biologics and holds stock and stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Margaret K. Yu is an employee of Janssen Research & Development and holds stock and stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Dana E. Rathkopf has served as a consultant/adviser to and has received research funding from Janssen Research & Development, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Ferring, Medivation, Millennium/ Takeda, and Novartis.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. Progression-free survival not analyzed for the nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) cohort and for four patients with metastatic disease not included in the nmCRPC efficacy analysis. AA = abiraterone acetate; CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer; mCRPC = metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient disposition. PSA = prostate-specific antigen. *Patients may have discontinued due to more than one type of progression.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Waterfall plot for (A) 12-wk prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and (B) maximal PSA response at any time.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Secondary end points: (A) Time to prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA); (B) metastasis-free survival. CI = confidence interval; NR = not reached.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chi KN, Bjartell A, Dearnaley D, et al. Castration-resistant prostate cancer: from new pathophysiology to new treatment targets. Eur Urol. 2009;56:594–605. - PubMed
    1. Smith MR, Kabbinavar F, Saad F, et al. Natural history of rising serum prostate-specific antigen in men with castrate nonmetastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2918–25. - PubMed
    1. Smith MR, Cook R, Lee KA, Nelson JB. Disease and host characteristics as predictors of time to first bone metastasis and death in men with progressive castration-resistant nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:2077–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith MR, Saad F, Oudard S, et al. Denosumab and bone metastasis-free survival in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: exploratory analyses by baseline prostate-specific antigen doubling time. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3800–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prostate cancer, v.1.2016. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Web site. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data