Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Jul 2;12(7):1909-23.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1151990. Epub 2016 May 10.

Determinants of European parents' decision on the vaccination of their children against measles, mumps and rubella: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Determinants of European parents' decision on the vaccination of their children against measles, mumps and rubella: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Garden Tabacchi et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

Low measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) immunization levels in European children highlight the importance of identifying determinants of parental vaccine uptake to implement policies for increasing vaccine compliance. The aim of this paper is to identify the main factors associated with partial and full MMR vaccination uptake in European parents, and combine the different studies to obtain overall quantitative measures. This activity is included within the ESCULAPIO project, funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. ORs and CIs were extracted, sources of heterogeneity explored and publication bias assessed. Forty-five papers were retrieved for the qualitative study, 26 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The following factors were associated with lower MMR vaccine uptake: misleading knowledge, beliefs and perceptions on vaccines (OR 0.57, CI 0.37-0.87); negative attitudes and behaviors toward vaccination (OR 0.71, CI 0.52-0.98); demographic characteristics, such as different ethnicity in Southern populations (OR 0.44, CI 0.31-0.61), higher child's age (OR 0.80, CI 0.76-0.85); low socio-economic status (OR 0.64, CI 0.51-0.80), especially low income (OR 0.39, CI 0.25-0.60) and education (OR 0.64, CI 0.48-0.84), high number of children (OR 0.54, CI 0.42-0.69), irregular marital status (OR 0.80, CI 0.66-0.96). The factors explaining heterogeneity were country location, administration modality, collection setting and responses reported on MMR alone or in combination. Findings from this study suggest policy makers to focus communication strategies on providing better knowledge, correct beliefs and perceptions on vaccines, and improving attitudes and behaviors in parents; and to target policies to people of ethnic minority from Southern Europe, low educated and deprived, with higher number of children and non-married marital status.

Keywords: determinant; measles; mumps and rubella; parents; uptake; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the systematic literature review process on the determinants of European parents' decision of vaccinating their children against measles, mumps and rubella.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Determinants of European parents' decision on the vaccination of their children against measles, mumps and rubella, reported in the retrieved 45 articles.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest plot of the overall effect (showed as exponentiated Odds Ratios and Confidence Intervals) of parental knowledge, beliefs and perceptions (KBP) on measles, mumps and rubella vaccine uptake, examined by KBP on vaccines and on diseases.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot of the overall effect (showed as exponentiated Odds Ratios and Confidence Intervals) of parental ethnic minority on measles, mumps and rubella vaccine uptake, examined by study geographical location.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forest plot of the overall effect (showed as exponentiated Odds Ratios and Confidence Intervals) of parental socio-economic status on measles, mumps and rubella vaccine uptake, examined by specific socio-economic determinants.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Forest plot of the overall effect (showed as exponentiated Odds Ratios and Confidence Intervals) of parental information source/advice opinions on measles, mumps and rubella vaccine uptake, examined by administration modality.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C. Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Evidence-Based Child Heal 2013; 8:2076-38; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ebch.1948 - DOI
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Measles and rubella monitoring, July 2015 – Reporting on July 2014 – June 2015 surveillance data and epidemic intelligence data to the end of July 2015. Stockholm: ECDC; 2015.
    1. Pearce A, Mindlin M, Cortina-Borja M, Bedford H. Characteristics of 5-year-olds who catch-up with MMR: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. BMJ Open [Internet] 2013; 3:1-9. PMID:23864213; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003152 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown KF, Kroll JS, Hudson MJ, Ramsay M, Green J, Long SJ, Vincent CA, Fraser G, Sevdalis N. Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: A systematic review. Vaccine 2010; 28:4235-48; PMID:20438879; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nagaraj A. Does qualitative synthesis of anecdotal evidence with that from scientific research help in understanding public health issues: A review of low MMR uptake. Eur J Public Health 2006; 16:85-8; PMID:16446303; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cki058 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances