Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;24(10):1396-402.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.36. Epub 2016 May 11.

22 Years of predictive testing for Huntington's disease: the experience of the UK Huntington's Prediction Consortium

Affiliations

22 Years of predictive testing for Huntington's disease: the experience of the UK Huntington's Prediction Consortium

Sheharyar S Baig et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Oct.

Erratum in

Abstract

Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative condition. At-risk individuals have accessed predictive testing via direct mutation testing since 1993. The UK Huntington's Prediction Consortium has collected anonymised data on UK predictive tests, annually, from 1993 to 2014: 9407 predictive tests were performed across 23 UK centres. Where gender was recorded, 4077 participants were male (44.3%) and 5122 were female (55.7%). The median age of participants was 37 years. The most common reason for predictive testing was to reduce uncertainty (70.5%). Of the 8441 predictive tests on individuals at 50% prior risk, 4629 (54.8%) were reported as mutation negative and 3790 (44.9%) were mutation positive, with 22 (0.3%) in the database being uninterpretable. Using a prevalence figure of 12.3 × 10(-5), the cumulative uptake of predictive testing in the 50% at-risk UK population from 1994 to 2014 was estimated at 17.4% (95% CI: 16.9-18.0%). We present the largest study conducted on predictive testing in HD. Our findings indicate that the vast majority of individuals at risk of HD (>80%) have not undergone predictive testing. Future therapies in HD will likely target presymptomatic individuals; therefore, identifying the at-risk population whose gene status is unknown is of significant public health value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age distribution of those tested in 1994–1998 (black) compared with 2010–2014 (red).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Selection of cases for analysis of cumulative uptake.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Summary of sensitivity testing for cumulative uptake of predictive tests in the United Kingdom. For the sake of clarity, not all scenarios are shown. The ratio of symptomatic individuals to those at risk in this figure is 1:4.2. Thick lines represent the confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bates GP, Dorsey R, Gusella JF et al: Huntington disease. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2015; 1: article number 15005. - PubMed
    1. Meissen GJ, Myers RH, Mastromauro CA et al: Predictive testing for Huntingtons disease with use of a linked DNA marker. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 535–542. - PubMed
    1. MacLeod R, Tibben A, Frontali M et al: Recommendations for the predictive genetic test in Huntington's disease. Clin Genet 2013; 83: 221–231. - PubMed
    1. Harper PS, Lim C, Craufurd D: Ten years of presymptomatic testing for Huntington's disease : the experience of the UK Huntington's Disease Prediction Consortium. J Med Genet 2000; 37: 567–571. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tassicker RJ, Teltscher B, Trembath MK et al: Problems assessing uptake of Huntington disease predictive testing and a proposed solution. Eur J Hum Genet 2009; 17: 66–70. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types