Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;13(4):344-352.
doi: 10.1177/1479972316647178. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

Measurement properties of the Timed Up & Go test in patients with COPD

Affiliations

Measurement properties of the Timed Up & Go test in patients with COPD

Rafael Mesquita et al. Chron Respir Dis. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the construct validity of the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to identify characteristics related to an abnormal TUG time and to examine the responsiveness of the TUG to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). TUG time was assessed before and after comprehensive PR in 500 COPD patients, and compared cross-sectionally in 100 non-COPD subjects. Physical health outcomes, mental health outcomes, symptom-related outcomes and multidimensional indices were assessed in COPD patients only. Good convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated by fair-to-moderate correlation with physical health outcomes, symptom-related outcomes and multidimensional indices ( rs = 0.18-0.70) and by little correlation with mental health outcomes ( rs = 0.21-0.26). COPD patients had a worse TUG time than non-COPD subjects, demonstrating known-groups validity. A TUG time of 11.2 seconds had good sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.83) for identifying patients with a baseline 6-minute walk distance <350 m. TUG time improved after PR ( p < 0.0001) and a change of 0.9-1.4 seconds was identified as clinically important. The TUG is valid and responsive in COPD. An abnormal result is indicative of poor health outcomes. This simple test provides valuable information and can be adopted in clinical and research settings.

Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; outcome assessment (healthcare); rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Correlation between TUG time and 6MWD in COPD patients. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; TUG: Timed Up & Go.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
TUG time in COPD patients and in non-COPD subjects. The horizontal bars represent median (interquartile range 25–75%). The dotted line corresponds to the 95th percentile in the sample of non-COPD subjects (i.e. 11 seconds), which represents the threshold adopted to identify an abnormal TUG time. TUG: Timed Up & Go; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
TUG time before and after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients. The horizontal bars represent mean (standard deviation). *p < 0.05. TUG: Timed Up & Go; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ES: effect size.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jones SE, Kon SS, Canavan JL, et al. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD. Thorax 2013; 68: 1015–1020. - PubMed
    1. Kon SS, Patel MS, Canavan JL, et al. Reliability and validity of 4-metre gait speed in COPD. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 333–340. - PubMed
    1. Kon SS, Canavan JL, Nolan CM, et al. The 4-metre gait speed in COPD: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1298–1305. - PubMed
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–148. - PubMed
    1. Mesquita R, Janssen DJ, Wouters EF, et al. Within-day test-retest reliability of the timed up & go test in patients with advanced chronic organ failure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 2131–2138. - PubMed