Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 May 11:16:176.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1431-5.

Assessment of the contribution of morbidity and mortality conferences to quality and safety improvement: a survey of participants' perceptions

André Lecoanet  1 , Gwenaëlle Vidal-Trecan  2   3   4 , Frédéric Prate  5 , Jean-François Quaranta  5 , Elodie Sellier  1   6 , Alizé Guyomard  1 , Arnaud Seigneurin  1   6 , Patrice François  7   8
Affiliations
Observational Study

Assessment of the contribution of morbidity and mortality conferences to quality and safety improvement: a survey of participants' perceptions

André Lecoanet et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence for the effectiveness of the morbidity and mortality conferences in improving patient safety is lacking. The aim of this survey was to assess the opinion of participants concerning the benefits and the functioning of morbidity and mortality conferences, according to their organizational characteristics.

Methods: We conducted a survey of professionals involved in a morbidity and mortality conference using a self-administered questionnaire in three French teaching hospitals in 2012. The questionnaire focused on the functioning of morbidity and mortality conferences, the perceived benefits, the motivations of participants, and how morbidity and mortality conferences could be improved. The perception of participants was analysed according to the characteristics of morbidity and mortality conferences.

Results: A total of 698 participants in 54 morbidity and mortality conferences completed the questionnaire. Most of them (91 %) were satisfied with how the morbidity and mortality conference they attended was conducted. The improvements in healthcare quality and patient safety were the main benefits perceived by participants. Effectiveness in improving safety was mainly perceived when cases were thoroughly analysed (adjusted odds ratio [a0R] =2.31 [1.14-4.66]). The existence of a written charter (p = 0.05), the use of a standardized case presentation (p = 0.049), and prior dissemination of the meeting agenda (p = 0.02) were also associated with the perception of morbidity and mortality conference effectiveness. The development and achievement of improvement initiatives were associated with morbidity and mortality conferences perceived as being more effective (p < 0.01). Participants suggested improving the attendance of medical and paramedical professionals to enhance the effectiveness of morbidity and mortality conferences.

Conclusions: Morbidity and mortality conferences were positively perceived. These results suggest that a structured framework and thoroughly analyzing cases improve their effectiveness.

Keywords: Hospital; Morbidity and mortality conferences; Patient safety; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kravet SJ, Howell E, Wright SM. Morbidity and mortality conference, grand rounds, and the ACGME’s core competencies. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:1192–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00523.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pierluissi E, Fischer MA, Campbell AR, Landefeld CS. Discussion of medical errors in morbidity and mortality conferences. JAMA. 2003;290:2838–42. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.21.2838. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orlander JD, Fincke BG. Morbidity and mortality conference: a survey of academic internal medicine departments. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:656–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20824.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aboumatar HJ, Blackledge CG, Dickson C, Heitmiller E, Freischlag J, Pronovost PJ. A descriptive study of morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models: results of the morbidity and mortality conference improvement study, phase 1. Am J Med Qual. 2007;22:232–8. doi: 10.1177/1062860607303292. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bal G, Sellier E, Tchouda SD, François P. Improving quality of care and patient safety through morbidity and mortality conferences. J Healthc Qual. 2012;36:29–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00203.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types