Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 Sep 15;10(5):739-48.
doi: 10.5009/gnl15466.

Short-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Short-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Il Ju Choi et al. Gut Liver. .

Abstract

Background/aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) that has demonstrated a minimal risk of lymph node metastasis in retrospective studies. We sought to prospectively evaluate the short-term outcomes of ESD treatment in EGCs.

Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of neoplasms 3 cm or less in diameter at endoscopic size evaluation was performed in 12 Korean ESD study grouprelated university hospitals and the National Cancer Center. Resected specimens were evaluated by the central pathologic review board.

Results: A patient cohort (n=712) with a total of 737 EGCs was analyzed. The margin-free en bloc resection rate was 97.3%, and curative resection of 640 lesions (86.8%) was achieved. Lower curative resection rates were associated with lesions 2 to 3 cm in size prior to ESD compared with lesions 2 cm or less in size (78.6% vs 88.1%, respectively, p=0.009). Significant factors associated with noncurative resection were moderately or poorly differentiated histological type, posterior wall tumor location, tumor size larger than 3 cm, ulceration, and submucosal invasion. Delayed bleeding occurred in 49 patients (6.9%), and 12 patients (1.7%) exhibited perforations.

Conclusions: ESD is an effective treatment with a high curative resection rate for EGCs that meets relatively conservative pre-ESD indications. Long-term survival outcomes should be evaluated in followup studies.

Keywords: Endoscopy; Outcome assess; Prospective studies; Stomach neoplasms; gastrointestinal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of participant selection. EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pathological and clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Complete resection was defined when an differentiated type mucosal early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymphovascular invasion was resected with tumor free margins. LVI, lymphovascular invasion; PD, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; Sm, submucosa; M, mucosa; APC, argon plasma coagulation.

References

    1. Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK. Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004–2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2013;45:86–94. doi: 10.4143/crt.2013.45.2.86. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim YG, Kong SH, Oh SY, et al. Effects of screening on gastric cancer management: comparative analysis of the results in 2006 and in 2011. J Gastric Cancer. 2014;14:129–134. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2014.14.2.129. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3) Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113–123. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lian J, Chen S, Zhang Y, Qiu F. A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:763–770. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, et al. Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1228–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.027. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources