Multiple arterial grafts improve survival with coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary interventions
- PMID: 27174511
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.089
Multiple arterial grafts improve survival with coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary interventions
Abstract
Objective: To compare long-term survival with multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (MultArt) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD).
Methods: We reviewed 12,615 patients with MVD with isolated primary CABG or PCI from 1993 to 2009. Patients with CABG (n = 6667) were grouped according to the number of arterial grafts into left internal thoracic artery (LITA)/saphenous vein (SV) (n = 5712) or MultArt (n = 955); patients with PCI (n = 5948) were grouped into balloon angioplasty (BA) (n = 1020), drug-eluting stent (DES) (n = 1686), and bare metal stent (BMS) (n = 3242).
Results: Unadjusted long-term survival was lower for CABG than PCI (15-year survival, 34% vs 46%; P < .001); however, in patients with MultArt, survival was greater than LITA/SV, BA, BMS (15-year survival, 65% vs 31%, 47%, 45%, respectively; P < .001), and DES (8-year survival, 87% vs 70%; P < .001). In matched analyses, 15-year survival of MultArt was higher than BA (66% vs 57%; P = .002), LITA/SV (64% vs 56%; P = .02), and BMS (5-year survival 94% vs 90%; P = .01), and similar to DES at 8 years. In multivariate analysis, compared with MultArt, LITA/SV had worse survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.52; P = .003). BMS (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.94; P < .001) and DES (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88; P < .001) had improved survival versus LITA/SV but not versus MultArt (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.94-1.34; P = .21, and HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.79-1.21; P = .83, respectively). Secondary analyses for treatment crossover indicated lower survival for LITA/SV versus MultArt and PCI.
Conclusions: In patients with MVD undergoing primary revascularization, MultArt increased survival benefit versus LITA/SV compared with PCI. Use of MultArt must increase.
Keywords: bypass grafting; coronary disease; revascularization; stents; survival.
Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Multiple arterial grafting: Please don't confuse me with the facts.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;152(2):380-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.065. Epub 2016 Apr 9. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 27179846 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Multiarterial grafts improve the rate of early major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: analysis of 12 615 patients with multivessel disease.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):746-752. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx171. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28595326
-
Multiple arterial grafting confers survival advantage compared to percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease: A propensity score adjusted analysis.Int J Cardiol. 2015;189:153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.059. Epub 2015 Apr 9. Int J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25897895
-
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 28007199
-
Multiple arterial grafts improve late survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of 8622 patients with multivessel disease.Circulation. 2012 Aug 28;126(9):1023-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084624. Epub 2012 Jul 18. Circulation. 2012. PMID: 22811577 Review.
-
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30025574
Cited by
-
Single or multiple arterial bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 31;43(13):1334-1344. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab537. Eur Heart J. 2022. PMID: 34405875 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assessing the benefits of anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 7;11:1393921. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1393921. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 38774665 Free PMC article.
-
Reply: Can you really turn a vein into an artery?JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 16;8:380. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.011. eCollection 2021 Dec. JTCVS Open. 2021. PMID: 36004135 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A Comparative Analysis of Single Versus Multiple Arterial Grafts in Coronary Arterial Bypass Grafting: Initial Experience in Iraq.Cureus. 2024 Aug 2;16(8):e66009. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66009. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39221339 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges with Evidence-Based Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Feb;19(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0820-7. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28185167 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous