Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 May 13:16:103.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0269-3.

Effect of a tailored assistive technology intervention on older adults and their family caregiver: a pragmatic study protocol

Louise Demers  1   2 , W Ben Mortenson  3   4   5 , Marcus J Fuhrer  6 , Jeffrey W Jutai  7   8 , Michelle Plante  9 , Jasmine Mah  7 , Frank DeRuyter  10
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of a tailored assistive technology intervention on older adults and their family caregiver: a pragmatic study protocol

Louise Demers et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Many older adults with mobility limitations use assistive technology to help them perform daily activities. However, little attention has been paid to the impact on their family caregivers. This neglect produces an incomplete portrayal of the outcomes of assistive technology provision. This paper describes the protocol for a study that examines the impact of a tailored assistive technology intervention that is inclusive of assistance users and their family caregivers.

Methods/design: This research will use a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative portion will be an experimental, single-blinded study in which participants are randomly assigned to either an experimental assistive technology intervention or a standard care group. We will enroll 240 participants (120 dyads) into the study from three Canadian sites. Participants will include older adults (>55) and family caregivers who provide ≥4 h per week of assistance with daily activities and social participation. The primary outcome measure for the older adults will be the Functional Autonomy Measurement System, and the primary outcome measure for the caregivers will be the Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcomes Measure. Qualitative data will be collected through detailed records of the therapists' interventions, as well as through interviews with dyads and therapists following the interventions. Data collection will occur at baseline (T0) with follow-ups at 6 weeks (T1), 22 weeks (T2), and 58 weeks (T3) after baseline evaluation.

Discussion: The findings from this study will help service providers and clinicians to move forward with assistive technology recommendations that are more attuned to the needs of both older adults with mobility limitations and their family caregivers. Additionally, the study's findings will enhance our conceptual understanding of the spectrum of assistive technology outcomes and set the stage for econometric studies assessing cost-effectiveness.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01640470 . Registered 11/21/2011.

Keywords: Assistive technology; Informal caregiving; Older adults; Randomized control trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ATPUT, Assistive Technology Provision, Updating and Tune-Up intervention
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kaye HS. Disability rates for working-age adults and for the elderly have stabilized, but trends for each mean different results for costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(1):127–34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0533. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cook AM, Polgar JM. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 4. St. Louis: Mosby; 2014.
    1. Cornman JC, Freedman VA, Agree EM. Measurement of assistive device use: Implications for estimates of device use and disability in late life. Gerontologist. 2005;45(3):347–58. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.3.347. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gitlin LN. Assistive technology in the home and community for older people: psychological and social considerations. In Scherer MJ, editor. Assistive technology: matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2002. pp. 109–122.
    1. Kaye HS, Yeager P, Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2008;20(4):194–203. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131946. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data