Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 13:16:146.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0655-8.

A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review

Inga Hege  1   2 , Andrzej A Kononowicz  3   4 , Daniel Tolks  5 , Samuel Edelbring  4   6 , Katja Kuehlmeyer  7
Affiliations

A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review

Inga Hege et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Virtual Patients (VPs) have been in the focus of research in healthcare education for many years. The aim of our study was to analyze how virtual patients are described in the healthcare education literature, and how the identified concepts relate to each other.

Methods: We performed a literature review and extracted 185 descriptions of virtual patients from the articles. In a qualitative content analysis approach we inductively-deductively developed categories and deducted subcategories. We constructed a concept map to illustrate these concepts and their interrelations.

Results: We developed the following five main categories: Patient, Teacher, Virtual Patient, Curriculum, and Learner. The concept map includes these categories and highlights aspects such as the under-valued role of patients in shaping their virtual representation and opposing concepts, such as standardization of learner activity versus learner-centeredness.

Conclusions: The presented concept map synthesizes VP descriptions and serves as a basis for both, VP use and discussions of research topics related to virtual patients.

Keywords: Concept mapping; Qualitative content analysis; Virtual patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process of the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Process applied to identify descriptions
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concept map
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Effective Use of Educational Technology in Medical Education: Summary Report of the 2006 AAMC Colloquium on Educational Technology. Washington: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2007.
    1. Ellaway R, Davies D. Design for learning: deconstructing virtual patient activities. Med Teach. 2011;33:303–310. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550969. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cook DA, Triola MM. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ. 2009;43:303–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kononowicz AA, Zary N, Edelbring S, Corral J, Hege I. Virtual patients-what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huwendiek S, De Leng B, Zary N, Fischer MR, Ruiz JG, Ellaway R. Towards a typology of virtual patients. Med Teach. 2009;31:743–8. doi: 10.1080/01421590903124708. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types