Obstetric management in vacuum-extraction deliveries
- PMID: 27179384
- DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.03.004
Obstetric management in vacuum-extraction deliveries
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this observational study was to describe the obstetric management in vacuum extraction (VE) deliveries and to compare these findings to instructions in clinical guidelines on VE.
Methods: In 2013, detailed data on management of 600 VE cases were consecutively collected from six different delivery units in Sweden. Each unit also contributed their own clinical VE guideline.
Results: In total, 93% of the VEs ended with a vaginal delivery while 7% failed and were converted to an emergency cesarean section. In 2.3% extraction time exceeded 20 minutes, and in 6% more than six pulls were used to deliver the fetus. Cup detachment occurred in 14.6%, and fundal pressure was used in 11% of the deliveries. In 2.3%, fetal station was assessed as above the level of the maternal ischial spines. The clinical guidelines on VE varied in scope and content between units, and were often incomplete according to best practice.
Conclusion: The vast majority of the VEs were conducted in accordance with safety recommendations. However, in a few extractions, safety rules were disregarded and more than six pulls or an extraction time of more than 20 minutes were used to complete the delivery.
Keywords: Clinical guidelines; Clinical management; Duration; Fetal station; Pulls; Vacuum extraction.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Predictors for failure of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May;200:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 26967343
-
Neonatal complications among 596 infants delivered by vacuum extraction (in relation to characteristics of the extraction).J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Sep;31(18):2402-2408. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1344631. Epub 2017 Jul 10. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018. PMID: 28629251
-
Outcome of attempted vaginal delivery after a previous vacuum extraction: a population-based study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Mar;95(3):362-7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12824. Epub 2015 Dec 21. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016. PMID: 26599917
-
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21802193 Review.
-
Operative vaginal delivery: current trends in obstetrics.Womens Health (Lond). 2008 May;4(3):281-90. doi: 10.2217/17455057.4.3.281. Womens Health (Lond). 2008. PMID: 19072477 Review.
Cited by
-
Prospective assessment of vacuum deliveries from midpelvic station in a tertiary care university hospital: Frequency, failure rates, labor characteristics and maternal and neonatal complications.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259926. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34784382 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reprod Health. 2021 May 18;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 34006288 Free PMC article.
-
Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 7;3(3):CD006067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006067.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28267223 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources