Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):476-9.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9127.

McKenzie treatment versus mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides for chronic mechanical low back pain

Saira Waqqar  1 , Syed Shakil-Ur-Rehman  2 , Shakeel Ahmad  3
Affiliations

McKenzie treatment versus mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides for chronic mechanical low back pain

Saira Waqqar et al. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Background and objective: Chronic mechanical low back pain is common among different age groups and genders. Different manual therapy techniques combined with exercise therapy and electrotherapy modalities play an important role in its management. Our objective was to compare the effects of McKenzie extension exercisesprogram (EEP) versus Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) for chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP).

Methods: This randomized control trial (RCT) was conducted at Riphah Physical Rehabilitation Centre, Pakistan Railways General Hospital Rawalpindi, from 1(st) July to 31(st) December 2014. The inclusion criteria was patients of both gender and age range 30-70 years with minimum 4 weeks history of CMLBP. A total of 37 patients were screened out as per inclusion criteria and randomly placed into two groups. Twenty patients in group A were treated with Mulligan SNAGs and 17 patients in group B with McKenzie EEP for four weeks at two session per week and single session per day. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Scale (ODI) and lumber Range of Motion (ROM) were used as an assessment tools and were measured at baseline and at the completion 4 weeks intervention. The data was analyzed with SPSS to draw the statistical and clinical significance of both interventions.

Results: At the completion of 4 weeks intervention the pre and post statistical analysis revealed that clinically the McKenzie EEP improved pain (mean 9.12 to 1.46) and disability (73.82 to 6.24) slightly more than Mulligan SNAGs (pain: from 8.85 to 2.55, disability 73.75 to 7.05), while the Mulligan SNAGs improved lumbar ROM more effectively than McKenzie EEP in all directions including flexion, extension, side bending and rotation. Statistically there was no significant difference between the effects of two interventions in managing pain and disability, and improving Lumber ROM.

Conclusion: McKenzie EEP is clinically slightly more effective in the management of pain and disability as compared with Mulligan SNAGs, while Mulligan SNAGs are more effective in the improvement of lumbar ROM as compared with Mechanize EEP in the management of CMLBP.

Keywords: Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain; McKenzie Extension Exercise Program; MulliganSustained Natural Apophyseal Glides.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mbada CE, Ayanniyi O, Ogunlade SO, Orimolade EA, Oladiran AB, Ogundele AO. Influence of McKenzie protocol and two modes of endurance exercises on health-related quality of life of patients with long-term mechanical low-back pain. Pan African Med J. 2014;17(Suppl1):5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R, Shakil-ur-Rehman S, Sibtain F. Comparison between Specific Lumber Mobilization and Core-Stability Exercises with Core-Stability Exercises Alone in Mechanical low back pain. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(1):157–160. doi:10.12669/pjms.301.4424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, Verhagen AP, Ostelo R, Koes BW, et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Euro Spine J. 2011;20(1):19–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson OE, Adegoke BO, Ogunlade SO. Comparison of four physiotherapy regimens in the treatment of long-term mechanical low back pain. Japanese Physical Therapy Assoc. 2010;13(1):9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bialosky JE, George SZ, Horn ME, Price DD, Staud R, Robinson ME. Spinal manipulative therapy–specific changes in pain sensitivity in individuals with low back pain (NCT01168999) J Pain. 2014;15(2):136–148. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources