Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jul 19;165(2):77-86.
doi: 10.7326/M15-2143. Epub 2016 May 17.

Comparative Effectiveness of Tai Chi Versus Physical Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial

Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative Effectiveness of Tai Chi Versus Physical Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial

Chenchen Wang et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Few remedies effectively treat long-term pain and disability from knee osteoarthritis. Studies suggest that Tai Chi alleviates symptoms, but no trials have directly compared Tai Chi with standard therapies for osteoarthritis.

Objective: To compare Tai Chi with standard physical therapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Design: Randomized, 52-week, single-blind comparative effectiveness trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01258985).

Setting: An urban tertiary care academic hospital.

Patients: 204 participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (mean age, 60 years; 70% women; 53% white).

Intervention: Tai Chi (2 times per week for 12 weeks) or standard physical therapy (2 times per week for 6 weeks, followed by 6 weeks of monitored home exercise).

Measurements: The primary outcome was Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included physical function, depression, medication use, and quality of life.

Results: At 12 weeks, the WOMAC score was substantially reduced in both groups (Tai Chi, 167 points [95% CI, 145 to 190 points]; physical therapy, 143 points [CI, 119 to 167 points]). The between-group difference was not significant (24 points [CI, -10 to 58 points]). Both groups also showed similar clinically significant improvement in most secondary outcomes, and the benefits were maintained up to 52 weeks. Of note, the Tai Chi group had significantly greater improvements in depression and the physical component of quality of life. The benefit of Tai Chi was consistent across instructors. No serious adverse events occurred.

Limitation: Patients were aware of their treatment group assignment, and the generalizability of the findings to other settings remains undetermined.

Conclusion: Tai Chi produced beneficial effects similar to those of a standard course of physical therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Primary funding source: National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Dr. Schmid reports grants from Brown University during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr. Harvey reports grants from Samumed, AbbVie, and Fidia Pharma outside the submitted work. Dr. Fielding reports grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study; grants from Nestlé, Regeneron, Astellas Pharma, and Pronutria Biosciences outside the submitted work; personal fees from Nestlé, Regeneron, Astellas Pharma, Pronutria Biosciences, GlaxoSmith-Kline, ICON, and Biophytis outside the submitted work; and nonfinancial support from Pronutria and Myosyntax outside the submitted work. Dr. Wong reports grants from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Rheumatology Research Foundation of the American College of Rheumatology and nonfinancial support from the European League Against Rheumatism outside the submitted work. Authors not named here have disclosed no conflicts of interest. Disclosures can also be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M15-2143.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram. * Two participants were inadvertently randomly assigned twice. Data from the first randomization were analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean change in outcomes, by treatment group. Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 12, 24, and 52 wk, but data points are offset slightly for clarity. SF-36 = 36-item Short Form Health Survey; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Comment in

Summary for patients in

References

    1. Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, et al. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1207–13. doi: 10.1002/art.24021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197–223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smalley WE, Griffin MR. The risks and costs of upper gastrointestinal disease attributable to NSAIDs. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1996;25:373–96. - PubMed
    1. Iversen MD. Rehabilitation interventions for pain and disability in osteoarthritis. Am J Nurs. 2012;112:S32–7. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000412649.02926.35. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jamtvedt G, Dahm KT, Christie A, Moe RH, Haavardsholm E, Holm I, et al. Physical therapy interventions for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: an overview of systematic reviews. Phys Ther. 2008;88:123–36. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data