The relationship between three-dimensional knee MRI bone shape and total knee replacement-a case control study: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
- PMID: 27185958
- PMCID: PMC4993955
- DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew191
The relationship between three-dimensional knee MRI bone shape and total knee replacement-a case control study: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
Abstract
Objective: There is growing understanding of the importance of bone in OA. Our aim was to determine the relationship between 3D MRI bone shape and total knee replacement (TKR).
Methods: A nested case-control study within the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort identified case knees with confirmed TKR for OA and controls that were matched using propensity scores. Active appearance modelling quantification of the bone shape of all knee bones identified vectors between knees having or not having OA. Vectors were scaled such that -1 and +1 represented the mean non-OA and mean OA shapes.
Results: Compared to controls (n = 310), TKR cases (n = 310) had a more positive mean baseline 3D bone shape vector, indicating more advanced structural OA, for the femur [mean 0.98 vs -0.11; difference (95% CI) 1.10 (0.88, 1.31)], tibia [mean 0.86 vs -0.07; difference (95% CI) 0.94 (0.72, 1.16)] and patella [mean 0.95 vs 0.03; difference (95% CI) 0.92 (0.65, 1.20)]. Odds ratios (95% CI) for TKR per normalized unit of 3D bone shape vector for the femur, tibia and patella were: 1.85 (1.59, 2.16), 1.64 (1.42, 1.89) and 1.36 (1.22, 1.50), respectively, all P < 0.001. After including Kellgren-Lawrence grade in a multivariable analysis, only the femur 3D shape vector remained significantly associated with TKR [odds ratio 1.24 (1.02, 1.51)].
Conclusion: 3D bone shape was associated with the endpoint of this study, TKR, with femoral shape being most associated. This study contributes to the validation of quantitative MRI bone biomarkers for OA structure-modification trials.
Keywords: 3D bone shape; active appearance modelling; knee; magnetic resonance imaging; osteoarthritis; total knee replacement.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
Figures
Comment in
-
Osteoarthritis: Bone as an imaging biomarker and treatment target in OA.Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016 Sep;12(9):503-4. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.113. Epub 2016 Jul 7. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016. PMID: 27383914 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D. et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1323–30. - PubMed
-
- Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet 2011;377:2115–26. - PubMed
-
- Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA. et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Int Med 2000;133:635–46. - PubMed
-
- Hootman JM, Helmick CG. Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:226–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
