Hydroxylated collagen peptide in urine as biomarker for detecting colorectal liver metastases
- PMID: 27186406
- PMCID: PMC4859663
Hydroxylated collagen peptide in urine as biomarker for detecting colorectal liver metastases
Abstract
The clinical efficacy of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a marker of colorectal liver metastasis is limited, motivating a search for new biomarkers. Recently, urine proteomic analysis revealed AGPP(-OH)GEAGKP(-OH)GEQGVP(-OH)GDLGAP(-OH)GP (AGP), a promising peptide for this application. This study aimed to determine whether combining urine AGP testing with serum CEA analyses improves the sensitivity of detecting colorectal liver metastases. Urine samples from 100 patients with CRLM were collected prospectively and compared to three control groups: healthy kidney donors, patients who were relapse-free for 24 months after curative CRLM surgery, and primary colorectal cancer patients. A stable isotope labeled peptide standard was used to quantify the abundance of AGP in urine samples by selective reaction monitoring. Combined testing of urine AGP levels and serum CEA levels revealed a significantly increased sensitivity compared to CEA alone (85% vs. 68%, P<0.001; specificity 84% and 91%, respectively). No correlation was found between CEA and AGP-positive test results within individual patients (r(2) = 0.08). Urine AGP testing was negative in the three control groups. These results indicate that collagen-derived urine AGP peptide with a specific hydroxylation pattern combined with serum CEA levels may significantly improve the detection of colorectal liver metastases in patients at risk.
Keywords: Colorectal liver metastases; biomarker; collagen; mass spectrometry; urine.
Figures



References
-
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
-
- Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J, Earle CC, Cummings B, McLeod R, Zuraw L, Zwaal C Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidencebased Care. Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Cancer. 2003;3:26. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Al-Asfoor A, Fedorowicz Z, Lodge M. Resection versus no intervention or other surgical interventions for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD006039. - PubMed
-
- Gregoire E, Hoti E, Gorden DL, de la Serna S, Pascal G, Azoulay D. Utility or futility of prognostic scoring systems for colorectal liver metastases in an era of advanced multimodal therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:568–574. - PubMed
-
- Grossmann I, de Bock GH, van de Velde CJ, Kievit J, Wiggers T. Results of a national survey among Dutch surgeons treating patients with colorectal carcinoma. Current opinion about follow-up, treatment of metastasis, and reasons to revise follow-up practice. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:787–792. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources