Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0155055.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155055. eCollection 2016.

Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in Korean Ginseng Field Soil Are Shifted by Cultivation Time

Affiliations

Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in Korean Ginseng Field Soil Are Shifted by Cultivation Time

Ngoc-Lan Nguyen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Traditional molecular methods have been used to examine bacterial communities in ginseng-cultivated soil samples in a time-dependent manner. Despite these efforts, our understanding of the bacterial community is still inadequate. Therefore, in this study, a high-throughput sequencing approach was employed to investigate bacterial diversity in various ginseng field soil samples over cultivation times of 2, 4, and 6 years in the first and second rounds of cultivation. We used non-cultivated soil samples to perform a comparative study. Moreover, this study assessed changes in the bacterial community associated with soil depth and the health state of the ginseng. Bacterial richness decreased through years of cultivation. This study detected differences in relative abundance of bacterial populations between the first and second rounds of cultivation, years of cultivation, and health states of ginseng. These bacterial populations were mainly distributed in the classes Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Sphingobacteria. In addition, we found that pH, available phosphorus, and exchangeable Ca+ seemed to have high correlations with bacterial class in ginseng cultivated soil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Rarefaction curves depicting the effect of sequencing on the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) within 30 soil samples.
OTUs are shown at the 3% genetic distance levels.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Richness and diversity indices along a time gradient.
(A) Richness indices and (B) Shannon’s diversity index. 2-year-old (Y2, n = 6), 4-year-old (Y4, n = 12), 6-year-old (Y6, n = 9), and non-cultivated (Y0, n = 3) soil samples. All values are indicated as the mean ± SE. “a” and “b” indicate differences in alpha diversity indices values between 2-year-old and 6-year-old samples (one-way ANOVA by post hoc Tukey’s test). *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Unweighted-pair-group method with arithmetic-mean (UPGMA) tree.
The UPGMA tress was generated from 1,000 jackknife iterations based on the non-normalized weighted UniFrac calculation. Dark blue, purple, grey, green, and yellow branches represent to soil samples from the Yulpori, Wondangri, Juwonri, Jajangri, and Jajakri areas, respectively. The circle, diamond, square, and triangle symbols indicate non-cultivated, 2-year-old, 4-year-old, and 6-year old soil samples, respectively. Black shapes represent non-cultivated samples, aqua is cultivated in the first round, and red is cultivated in the second round. Green font represents healthy samples and red represents unhealthy samples.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Relative abundance of bacterial phyla in 30 soil samples.
Relative abundances are reported as percent of total bacterial sequences observed per samples. The other category includes phyla showing a percentage of reads <2% of the total reads in all of the soil samples.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Heat map analysis showing the distributions of the core bacterial classes.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Network-inferred correlations of bacterial classes to soil parameters.
Soil parameters (yellow hexagons) included soil pH, available phosphorus (P2O5), and exchangeable Ca2+. Aqua V-shapes indicate the classes that decreased with cultivation time, and the red triangles indicate the classes that increased with cultivation time. The light green diamond (Actinobacteria) indicates changes associated with soil depths. Red and blue fonts indicate the classes that were more and less populous, respectively, in unhealthy samples compared to healthy samples. The solid green lines indicate positive correlations while dashed red lines indicate negative correlations. Edge width is the correlation value. All correlations are significant at p<0.05 (one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s test).
Fig 7
Fig 7. Heat map visualization of the distributions of core assigned families.
The assigned families composing the core microbiota of the ginseng soil samples, with up to 46.9% relative abundance.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plots of the core bacterial families in 30 soil samples.
(A) nMDS plots show dissimilarities between cultivation years: non-cultivated (black), 2-year-old (aqua), 4-year-old (blue), and 6-year-old (red) samples. (B) nMDS plots show dissimilarities based on geography: Jajangri (JJG, black), Jajakri (JJK, pink), Wondangri (WD, darkgreen), Juwonri (JW, violet), and Yulpori (YP, orange).
Fig 9
Fig 9. Changes in bacterial populations according to rounds of cultivation.
(A) Boxplots indicate bacterial classes, (B) Boxplots indicate bacterial families. R0, non-cultivation; R1, first round of cultivation; R2, second round of cultivation. The p-values were generated by one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s test. “a” and “b” indicate significant differences between the round of cultivation (p<0.05).
Fig 10
Fig 10. Changes in bacterial populations over years of cultivation.
Bubbles represent the average relative abundances of bacterial populations at the class level (A) and the family level (B). 2-year-old (Y2, n = 6), 4-year-old (Y4, n = 12), 6-year-old (Y6, n = 9), and non-cultivated (Y0, n = 3) soil samples. All bacterial populations showed significant differences between cultivation times with p<0.05 (one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s test).
Fig 11
Fig 11. Healthy and unhealthy ginseng soil samples had significant differences in bacterial population.
(A) At the class level, (B) At the family level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Choi KT (2008) Botanical characteristic, pharmacological effects and medicinal components of Korean Panax ginseng CA Meyer. Acta Pharmacol Sin 29: 1109–1118. 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00869.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ernst E (2010) Panax ginseng: An overview of the clinical evidence. J Ginseng Res 34: 259–263.
    1. Huu Tung N, Uto T, Morinaga O, Kim YH, Shoyama Y (2012) Pharmacological effects of ginseng on liver functions and diseases: A minireview. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012: Article ID 173297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bang CS, Hong SH, Suk KT, Kim JB, Han SH, Sung H, et al. (2014) Effects of Korean Red Ginseng (Panax ginseng), urushiol (Rhus vernicifera Stokes), and probiotics (Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011 and Lactobacillus acidophilus R0052) on the gut–liver axis of alcoholic liver disease. J Ginseng Res 38: 167–172. 10.1016/j.jgr.2014.04.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim J, Lee H, Kang KS, Chun KH, Hwang GS (2015) Protective effect of Korean red ginseng against glucocorticoid–induced osteoporosis in vitro and in vivo. J Ginseng Res 39: 46–53. 10.1016/j.jgr.2014.06.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources