Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May 11;21(5):615.
doi: 10.3390/molecules21050615.

Inhibitors of the Hydrolytic Enzyme Dimethylarginine Dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH): Discovery, Synthesis and Development

Affiliations
Review

Inhibitors of the Hydrolytic Enzyme Dimethylarginine Dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH): Discovery, Synthesis and Development

Rhys B Murphy et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) is a highly conserved hydrolytic enzyme found in numerous species, including bacteria, rodents, and humans. In humans, the DDAH-1 isoform is known to metabolize endogenous asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and monomethyl arginine (l-NMMA), with ADMA proposed to be a putative marker of cardiovascular disease. Current literature reports identify the DDAH family of enzymes as a potential therapeutic target in the regulation of nitric oxide (NO) production, mediated via its biochemical interaction with the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) family of enzymes. Increased DDAH expression and NO production have been linked to multiple pathological conditions, specifically, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and septic shock. As such, the discovery, chemical synthesis, and development of DDAH inhibitors as potential drug candidates represent a growing field of interest. This review article summarizes the current knowledge on DDAH inhibition and the derived pharmacokinetic parameters of the main DDAH inhibitors reported in the literature. Furthermore, current methods of development and chemical synthetic pathways are discussed.

Keywords: arginine; asymmetric dimethylarginine; dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase; enzyme inhibitors; monomethyl arginine; nitric oxide; organic synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The endogenous methylated arginines, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA 1), monomethylarginine (l-NMMA 2), and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA 3) act as direct or indirect inhibitors of the NOS family of enzymes. ADMA (1) and l-NMMA (2) are substrates for human DDAH-1.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
ADMA and l-NMMA are substrates for DDAH-1 and are converted to l-citrulline (4) and an amine species 5 or 6.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Synthetic scheme for generating HcyNO (9). Reagents and Conditions: (i) 5 M NaOH, 37 °C, 5 min, 96%; (ii) NaNO2, 2 M HCl, 37 °C, 15 min, >99%.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Schematic of the reaction mechanism proposed by Knipp et al. [102] for the covalent inhibition of DDAH-1 by HcyNO (9) at Cys273. Adapted with permission from [102]. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Synthetic scheme for generating 2-chloroacetamidine (11) (the conditions described afford the hydrochloride salt). Reagents and Conditions: (i) NaOMe, dry MeOH, overnight; (ii) AcOH, NH4Cl, reflux, 6 h, 89%.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Synthetic scheme for generating the DDAH-1 biochemical probe N-but-3-ynyl-2-chloro-acetamidine (18). Reagents and Conditions: (i) DCM, TEA, DMAP, MsCl, 0 °C for 2 h then 25 °C for 3 h, 62%; (ii) anhydrous DMF, NaN3, 70 °C, 3.5 h; (iii) Et2O, Ph3P, 0 °C for 2 h, addition of H2O, then 25 °C for 20 h, 49% (two steps); (iv) dry HCl(g) at 0 °C for 1 h, stop HCl(g), then 0 °C for 4 h and RT overnight 48%–76%; (v) H2O, pH = 10, 0 °C for 3 h, 25 °C for 2 h, neutralized, RT for 1.5 days, 62%. Adapted with permission from [109]. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society.
Scheme 6
Scheme 6
Synthetic scheme for generating (S)-2-amino-4-(3-methylguanidino)butanoic acid (4124W), as reported by Ueda et al. [80] using the methods of Ogawa et al. [32] and Corbin et al. [111]. Reagents and Conditions: (i) (1) 2,4-diamino-n-butyric acid dihydrochloride (20), copper acetate, 1:1 NH4OH/H2O; (2) N,S-dimethylthiopseudouronium iodide (19) RT, 24 h; (3) Dowex 50WX4 (NH4+ form), 4124W (21) was crystallized as the hydrochloride salt.
Scheme 7
Scheme 7
Synthetic scheme for generating (S)-2-amino-4-(3-methylguanidino)butanoic acid analogues. Reagents and Conditions: (i) DEAD, PPh3, THF, 0 °C-RT, 3–16 h; (ii) DIPEA, CH3CN, RT, 24 h; (iii) 4M HCl/1,4-dioxane, RT, 24–72 h, 12%–67% overall; (iv) SOCl2, 0 °C for 30 min, reflux for 1 h, RT overnight, 44%–84%. Adapted with permission from [112]. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society.
Scheme 8
Scheme 8
Synthetic scheme for generating N,N-disubstituted alkylguanidinobutanoic acid and N-arylguanidine analogues. Reagents and Conditions: (i) DEAD, Ph3P, THF, 0 °C-RT, 3–16 h; (ii) DIPEA, CH3CN, RT, 24 h; (iii) 4 M HCl/1,4-dioxane, 24–72 h, 0.29%–41% overall. Adapted with permission from [112]. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society.
Scheme 9
Scheme 9
Synthetic scheme for generating L-257 (39) and L-291 (40). Reagents and Conditions: (i) DEAD, Ph3P, THF, 0 °C-RT, 3–16 h; (ii) DIPEA, CH3CN, RT, 24 h; (iii) 4 M HCl/1,4-dioxane, 24–72 h, 44% overall; (iv) SOCl2, 0 °C for 30 min, reflux for 1 h, RT overnight, 80%. Adapted with permission from [112]. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society.
Scheme 10
Scheme 10
Synthetic scheme for generating NG-(2-methoxyethyl)-l-arginine carboxylate bioisosteres. Reagents and Conditions: (i) CDI, DBU, methanesulfonamide, THF, RT, 7 h, 51%; (ii) HATU, DIPEA, O-methylhydroxylamine hydrochloride, THF, 0 °C-RT, 16 h, 86%; (iii) HATU, DIPEA, O-benzylhydroxylamine, THF, 0 °C-RT, 16 h, 57%; (iv) 4 M HCl/1,4-dioxane, DCM, RT, 30 min, 99%; (v) DIPEA, DCM, RT, 24 h, 43a 42%, 43b 22%, 43c 56%; (vi) TFMSA/TFA, RT, 1 h, 99%. Reproduced in part from [117] with permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Scheme 11
Scheme 11
Synthetic scheme for generating NG-(2-methoxyethyl)-l-arginine carboxylate bioisosteres. Reagents and Conditions: (i) i-BuCOCl, N-methylmorpholine, NH4OH (30%), THF, −10 °C-RT, 3 h, 99%; (ii) TFAA, TEA, THF, 0 °C-RT, 16 h, 47%; (iii) 4 M HCl/1,4-dioxane, DCM, RT, 30 min, 99%; (iv) DIPEA, DCM, RT, 24 h, 40%; (v) NaN3, ZnBr2, H2O/2-propanol, reflux, 16 h, 30%; (vi) (1) NH2OH·HCl, NaHCO3, DMSO, reflux, 16 h; (2) CDI, DBU, THF, reflux, 30 min, 73%; (vii) TFMSA/TFA, DCM, RT, 30 min, 99%. Reproduced in part from [117] with permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Scheme 12
Scheme 12
Synthetic scheme for generating N5-(1-iminoalk(en)yl)-l-ornithine derivatives. Reagents and Conditions: (i) dry HCl(g) at 0 °C for 1 h, stop HCl(g), then 0 °C for 4 h and RT overnight; (ii) H2O, 5 °C, pH = 10, 1.5 h, adjust pH = 7, overnight, Dowex 50WX8-400 (H2O then 10% aqueous pyridine); (iii) 6 M HCl, EtOAc, 84%–94% from Nα-Boc-l-ornithine (52). Adapted with permission from [127]. Copyright 1999 American Chemical Society.
Figure 2
Figure 2
N5-(1-Iminoalk(en)yl)-l-ornithine derivatives, L-VNIO (54a), L-IPO (54b), and Cl-NIO (54c), as synthesized by Kotthaus et al. [114] and Wang et al. [128,129].
Scheme 13
Scheme 13
Synthetic scheme for generating PFP sulfonate esters 61. Reagents and Conditions: (i) DCM, TEA, 0 °C, 59%; (ii) Method A: NaHCO3, anhydrous MgSO4, DCM, reflux, 24 h, 73%–90% [133]; Method B: NaOAc, EtOH, RT, 90% [134]; (iii) dry toluene, reflux, 1–24 h, 44%–75%. Reproduced in part from [130,131,132,133] with permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry and the American Chemical Society.
Scheme 14
Scheme 14
Synthetic scheme for generating indolylthiobarbituric acid derivatives 68. Reagents and Conditions: (i) NaOMe, MeOH, 60 °C, 6 h, yields not reported; (ii) NaH, DMF, RT, overnight, 83%; (iii) 6 M HCl, EtOH, RT, 2–3 h, yields not reported.
Scheme 15
Scheme 15
Synthetic scheme for generating ebselen (73). Reagents and Conditions: (i) (1) DCM, pyridine, SOCl2, reflux, 2 h; (2) toluene, aniline, reflux, 3 h, 80%; (ii) dry THF, n-BuLi, nitrogen atmosphere, 0 °C, 30 min, 76% (determined via methylation of 72); (iii) same solution as step (ii), Se, 0 °C, 30 min; (iv) same solution as step (iii), CuBr2, 30 min at −78 °C, then 2 h at RT, 63%. Adapted with permission from [147], copyright 1989 American Chemical Society, and [148], copyright 2003 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan.
Scheme 16
Scheme 16
Synthetic scheme for generating 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE, 76). Reagents and Conditions: (i) dry oxygen-free DCM, RT, 25 h, 75%, Hoveyda-Grubbs 2nd generation (0.025 eq.).
Scheme 17
Scheme 17
Synthetic scheme for generating PD 404182 (79). Reagents and Conditions: Route A: (i) DMF, NaH, CS2, argon atmosphere, 80 °C, 12 h, 88%; (ii) (1) 0.1 M NaOH, MeOH/H2O (9:1), reflux, 12 h; (2) anhydrous EtOH, BrCN, argon atmosphere, reflux, 2 h, 61% (two steps). Route B: (iii) DMF, NaH, argon atmosphere, 80 °C, 2 h, 62%; (iv) TFA, CHCl3, molecular sieves 4 Å, reflux, 1 h, 85%. Adapted with permission from [172,173]. Copyright 1975, 2010 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chemical structures of commonly prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) 82af.
Scheme 18
Scheme 18
Synthetic scheme for generating omeprazole (82a). Reagents and Conditions: Route A: (i) 1 M NaOH (2 eq.), EtOH, RT, 8 h; (ii) catalyst: V2O5, NaVO3, NH4VO3, [(CH3COCH2COCH3)2VO] (0.0001–0.1 eq.), H2O2: 10%–70% aqueous or organic solution (1–3 eq.), solvent: halogenated hydrocarbons, ethers, alcohols, ketones, nitriles, or H2O, temperature: 0 °C to boiling point of the solvent, 0.5–24 h, 89%–93%. Route B: (iii) condensation, conditions not specified in patent; (iv) [(CH3COCH2COCH3)2VO] (0.006 eq.), 30% H2O2, acetone, 0–5 °C for 1 h then 20–22 °C for 1 h, 90%; (v) 10% NaOH, nitrogen atmosphere, 50 °C, 3 h; (vi) CO2, extraction into 1:1 v/v isopropanol/toluene, reflux, 20–30 min, 42% (across steps (v) and (vi)).
Scheme 19
Scheme 19
Synthetic scheme for generating 1,2,3-triazoles 95. Reagents and Conditions: (i) 92a (Ph3P)2PdCl2, CuI, TEA, TIPS-acetylene, DMF, 80 °C, 72 h, 30%, 92b (Ph3P)2PdCl2, CuI, TEA, ethynyl-TMS, 80 °C, 20 h, 48%; (ii) DPPA, DBU, toluene, RT, 16 h, 94a 55%, 94b 83%; (iii) CuI, sodium ascorbate, TEA, DCM, RT, 24 h, 95a 65%, 95b 30%. Reproduced in part from [117] with permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vallance P., Leiper J. Blocking no synthesis: How, where and why? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002;1:939–950. doi: 10.1038/nrd960. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tran C.T., Fox M.F., Vallance P., Leiper J.M. Chromosomal localization, gene structure, and expression pattern of DDAH1: Comparison with DDAH2 and implications for evolutionary origins. Genomics. 2000;68:101–105. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greco R., Ferrigno A., Demartini C., Zanaboni A., Mangione A.S., Blandini F., Nappi G., Vairetti M., Tassorelli C. Evaluation of ADMA-DDAH-NOS axis in specific brain areas following nitroglycerin administration: Study in an animal model of migraine. J. Headache Pain. 2015;16, 74:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0560-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. D’Mello R., Sand C.A., Pezet S., Leiper J.M., Gaurilcikaite E., McMahon S.B., Dickenson A.H., Nandi M. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 is involved in spinal nociceptive plasticity. Pain. 2015;156:2052–2060. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000269. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hasegawa K., Wakino S., Kimoto M., Minakuchi H., Fujimura K., Hosoya K., Komatsu M., Kaneko Y., Kanda T., Tokuyama H., et al. The hydrolase DDAH2 enhances pancreatic insulin secretion by transcriptional regulation of secretagogin through a sirt1-dependent mechanism in mice. FASEB J. 2013;27:2301–2315. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-226092. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources