Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):91-105.
doi: 10.1111/mcn.12258.

Can water, sanitation and hygiene help eliminate stunting? Current evidence and policy implications

Affiliations
Review

Can water, sanitation and hygiene help eliminate stunting? Current evidence and policy implications

Oliver Cumming et al. Matern Child Nutr. 2016 May.

Abstract

Stunting is a complex and enduring challenge with far-reaching consequences for those affected and society as a whole. To accelerate progress in eliminating stunting, broader efforts are needed that reach beyond the nutrition sector to tackle the underlying determinants of undernutrition. There is growing interest in how water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions might support strategies to reduce stunting in high-burden settings, such as South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. This review article considers two broad questions: (1) can WASH interventions make a significant contribution to reducing the global prevalence of childhood stunting, and (2) how can WASH interventions be delivered to optimize their effect on stunting and accelerate progress? The evidence reviewed suggests that poor WASH conditions have a significant detrimental effect on child growth and development resulting from sustained exposure to enteric pathogens but also due to wider social and economic mechanisms. Realizing the potential of WASH to reduce stunting requires a redoubling of efforts to achieve universal access to these services as envisaged under the Sustainable Development Goals. It may also require new or modified WASH strategies that go beyond the scope of traditional interventions to specifically address exposure pathways in the first 2 years of life when the process of stunting is concentrated.

Keywords: child nutrition; child public health; early growth; sanitation; stunting; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The ‘F‐diagram’. Source: Adapted from Wagner & Lanoix 1958 and Kawata 1978.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical breakdown of weekly household expenditure in low‐income areas of Khartoum, Sudan (1987). Source: Cairncross & Kinnear 1992.

References

    1. Arnold B.F., Null C., Luby S.P., Unicomb L., Stewart C.P., Dewey K.G. et al. (2013) Cluster‐randomised controlled trials of individual and combined water, sanitation, hygiene and nutritional interventions in rural Bangladesh and Kenya: the WASH Benefits study design and rationale. BMJ open 3, e003476. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bain R., Cronk R., Hossain R., Bonjour S., Onda K., Wright J. et al. (2014a) Global assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water based on a systematic review. Tropical Medicine & International Health 19, 917–927. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bain R., Wright J., Christenson E. & Bartram J. (2014b) Rural:urban inequalities in post 2015 targets and indicators for drinking‐water. Science of the Total Environment 490, 509–513. - PubMed
    1. Baker S.J. & Mathan V.I. (1972) Tropical enteropathy and tropical sprue. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 25, 1047–1055. - PubMed
    1. Barnard S., Routray P., Majorin F., Peletz R., Boisson S., Sinha A. et al. (2013) Impact of Indian Total Sanitation Campaign on latrine coverage and use: a cross‐sectional study in Orissa three years following programme implementation. PloS One 8, e71438. - PMC - PubMed