Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:7134283.
doi: 10.1155/2016/7134283. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

Cuspal Displacement Induced by Bulk Fill Resin Composite Polymerization: Biomechanical Evaluation Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors

Affiliations

Cuspal Displacement Induced by Bulk Fill Resin Composite Polymerization: Biomechanical Evaluation Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors

Alexandra Vinagre et al. Int J Biomater. 2016.

Abstract

Polymerization shrinkage is a major concern to the clinical success of direct composite resin restorations. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of polymerization shrinkage strain of two resin composites on cuspal movement based on the use of fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors. Twenty standardized Class II cavities prepared in upper third molars were allocated into two groups (n = 10). Restorations involved the bulk fill placement of conventional microhybrid resin composite (Esthet•X® HD, Dentsply DeTrey) (Group 1) or flowable "low-shrinkage" resin composite (SDR™, Dentsply DeTrey) (Group 2). Two FBG sensors were used per restoration for real-time measurement of cuspal linear deformation and temperature variation. Group comparisons were determined using ANCOVA (α = 0.05) considering temperature as the covariate. A statistically significant correlation between cuspal deflection, time, and material was observed (p < 0.01). Cuspal deflection reached 8.8 μm (0.23%) and 7.8 μm (0.20%) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. When used with bulk fill technique, flowable resin composite SDR™ induced significantly less cuspal deflection than the conventional resin composite Esthet•X® HD (p = 0.015) and presented a smoother curve slope during the polymerization. FBG sensors appear to be a valid tool for accurate real-time monitoring of cuspal deformation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the shape and dimensions of the cavity (adapted from Palin et al. 2005 [5]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic overview of the experimental setup used to measure the setting cuspal deformation and the temperature variation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Temperature variation induced by the LED light-curing unit.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average temperature variation obtained during the light curing of the restorations with the SDR and Esthet•X® HD resins.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average cuspal deformation induced by SDR and Esthet•X® HD resins during the 10 minutes of real-time monitoring.

References

    1. Ferracane J. L. Buonocore lecture. Placing dental composites—a stressful experience. Operative Dentistry. 2008;33(3):247–257. - PubMed
    1. Lee M.-R., Cho B.-H., Son H.-H., Um C.-M., Lee I.-B. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dental Materials. 2007;23(3):288–295. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tantbirojn D., Versluis A., Pintado M. R., DeLong R., Douglas W. H. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration. Dental Materials. 2004;20(6):535–542. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kwon Y., Ferracane J., Lee I.-B. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dental Materials. 2012;28(7):801–809. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palin W. M., Fleming G. J. P., Nathwani H., Burke F. J. T., Randall R. C. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Dental Materials. 2005;21(4):324–335. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources