A Review of 3D Printing Techniques and the Future in Biofabrication of Bioprinted Tissue
- PMID: 27193609
- DOI: 10.1007/s12013-016-0730-0
A Review of 3D Printing Techniques and the Future in Biofabrication of Bioprinted Tissue
Abstract
3D printing has been around in the art, micro-engineering, and manufacturing worlds for decades. Similarly, research for traditionally engineered skin tissue has been in the works since the 1990s. As of recent years, the medical field also began to take advantage of the untapped potential of 3D printing for the biofabrication of tissue. To do so, researchers created a set of goals for fabricated tissues based on the characteristics of natural human tissues and organs. Fabricated tissue was then measured against this set of standards. Researchers were interested in not only creating tissue that functioned like natural tissues but in creating techniques for 3D printing that would print tissues quickly, efficiently, and ultimately result in the ability to mass produce fabricated tissues. Three promising methods of 3D printing emerged from their research: thermal inkjet printing with bioink, direct-write bioprinting, and organ printing using tissue spheroids. This review will discuss all three printing techniques, as well as their advantages, disadvantages, and the possibility of future advancements in the field of tissue fabrication.
Keywords: 3D printed tissue; Biofabrication; Bioprinting.
Similar articles
-
The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology.Biofabrication. 2015 Nov 2;7(4):045002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045002. Biofabrication. 2015. PMID: 26523399
-
Accessible bioprinting: adaptation of a low-cost 3D-printer for precise cell placement and stem cell differentiation.Biofabrication. 2016 Jun 7;8(2):025017. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025017. Biofabrication. 2016. PMID: 27271208
-
Towards Single-Step Biofabrication of Organs on a Chip via 3D Printing.Trends Biotechnol. 2016 Sep;34(9):685-688. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jul 13. Trends Biotechnol. 2016. PMID: 27424152
-
Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 Mar 6;30(3):32. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6234-x. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019. PMID: 30840132 Review.
-
Three-dimensional bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Biotechnol Lett. 2016 Feb;38(2):203-11. doi: 10.1007/s10529-015-1975-1. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Biotechnol Lett. 2016. PMID: 26466597 Review.
Cited by
-
Targeted Printing of Cells: Evaluation of ADA-PEG Bioinks for Drop on Demand Approaches.Gels. 2022 Mar 24;8(4):206. doi: 10.3390/gels8040206. Gels. 2022. PMID: 35448107 Free PMC article.
-
Preparation of High-Drug-Loaded Clarithromycin Gastric-Floating Sustained-Release Tablets Using 3D Printing.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021 Apr 11;22(3):131. doi: 10.1208/s12249-021-01994-z. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021. PMID: 33839973
-
Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters to produce haemodialysis curcumin-loaded vascular grafts.Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023 Aug;13(8):2058-2071. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01078-2. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 34642844 Free PMC article.
-
Current and Future Perspectives on Skin Tissue Engineering: Key Features of Biomedical Research, Translational Assessment, and Clinical Application.Adv Healthc Mater. 2019 Mar;8(5):e1801471. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801471. Epub 2019 Feb 1. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019. PMID: 30707508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Methods and Mechanisms to Differentiate Endothelial-Like Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells from Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Vascularization in Vaginal Reconstruction.Mol Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;60(6):396-411. doi: 10.1007/s12033-018-0079-2. Mol Biotechnol. 2018. PMID: 29611116
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials