Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications
- PMID: 27194265
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4958-y
Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications
Abstract
Objectives: Open inguinal hernia repair is felt to be a less expensive operation than a laparoscopic one. Performing open repair on patients with an obese body mass index (BMI) results in longer operative times, longer hospital stay, and complications that will potentially impose higher cost to the facility and patient. This study aims to define the ideal BMI at which a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be advantageous over open inguinal hernia repair.
Methods: The NSQIP database was analyzed for (n = 64,501) complications, mortality, and operating time for open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs during the time period from 2005 to 2012. Bilateral and recurrent hernias were excluded. Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess associations between type of surgery and categorical variables including demographics, risk factors, and 30-day outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine whether odds ratios differed by level of BMI. The HCUP database was used for determining difference in cost and length of stay between open and laparoscopic procedures.
Results: There were 17,919 laparoscopic repairs and 46,582 open repairs in the study period. The overall morbidity (across all BMI categories) is statistically greater in the open repair group when compared to the laparoscopic group (p = 0.03). Postoperative complications (including wound disruption, failure to wean from the ventilator, and UTI) were greater in the open repair group across all BMI categories. Deep incisional surgical site infections (SSI) were more common in the overweight open repair group (p = 0.026). The return to the operating room across all BMI categories was statistically significant for the open repair group (n = 269) compared to the laparoscopic repair group (n = 70) with p = 0.003. There was no difference in the return to operating room between the BMI categories. The odds ratio (OR) was found to be statistically significant when comparing the obese category to both normal and overweight populations for the open procedure.
Conclusion: Open hernia repairs have more complications than do laparoscopic ones; however, there does not appear to be a difference in treating obese patients with hernias using a laparoscopic approach versus an open one. One may consider using a laparoscopic approach in overweight patients (BMI 25-29.9) as there appears to be fewer deep SSI.
Keywords: Body mass index (BMI); Inguinal hernia; Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP); Open inguinal hernia repair; Surgical site infection (SSI).
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in patients with obesity: an American College of Surgeons NSQIP clinical outcomes analysis.Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1305-1310. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5112-6. Epub 2016 Jul 21. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27444828
-
A matched comparison of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver disease using propensity score matching.Hernia. 2018 Jun;22(3):419-426. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1693-9. Epub 2017 Oct 25. Hernia. 2018. PMID: 29071496
-
The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset.Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):917-921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5055-y. Epub 2016 Jun 28. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27351659
-
Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice.Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):221-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8934-y. Epub 2003 Nov 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 14625733 Review.
-
Critical values for body mass index related to morbidity in high-volume low-complexity general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Apr;107(4):242-252. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057. Epub 2024 Aug 14. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025. PMID: 39141001 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management.BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5):zrad080. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080. BJS Open. 2023. PMID: 37862616 Free PMC article.
-
Ergonomic strain of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (ESRALI)-a crossover trial.Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3095-3105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11676-7. Epub 2025 Mar 31. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40164838 Free PMC article.
-
Concurrent hydrocelectomy during inguinal herniorrhaphy is a risk factor for complications and reoperation: data from rural Haiti.Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):759-765. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1636-5. Epub 2017 Aug 10. Hernia. 2017. PMID: 28799117
-
Tailoring Weight Loss Before Hernia Surgery: Distinguishing Between Two Types of Obesity.J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 12;4:14322. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14322. eCollection 2025. J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025. PMID: 40144576 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis.Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1033-1039. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02433-5. Epub 2021 May 31. Hernia. 2022. PMID: 34057626
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical