Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2016 Jul;34(7):625-7.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0413-0.

Why Cancer?

Alan Haycox  1
Affiliations
Editorial

Why Cancer?

Alan Haycox. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jul.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

  • Cancer Drugs Fund 2.0: A Missed Opportunity?
    McCabe C, Paul A, Fell G, Paulden M. McCabe C, et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jul;34(7):629-33. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0403-2. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016. PMID: 27002519 No abstract available.

References

    1. McCabe C, Paul A, Fell G, Paulden M. Cancer drugs fund 2.0: a missed opportunity? Pharmacoeconomics. Epub 22 March 2016. - PubMed
    1. Haycox A. How much should the NHS pay for a QALY? Pharmacoconomics. 2013;31:357–359. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0062-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, et al. Methods for the estimation of the NICE cost effectiveness threshold. CHE Research Paper 81. York: University of York, Centre for Health Economics; 2013.
    1. Towse A. Should NICE’s threshold range for cost per QALY be raised? Yes. BMJ. 2009;338:b181. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b181. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rafferty J. Should NICE’s threshold range for cost per QALY be raised? No. BMJ. 2009;338:b185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b185. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources