Vital capacity and COPD: the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS)
- PMID: 27194908
- PMCID: PMC4859418
- DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S104644
Vital capacity and COPD: the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS)
Abstract
Background: Spirometric diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is based on the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/vital capacity (VC), either as a fixed value <0.7 or below the lower limit of normal (LLN). Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a proxy for VC. The first aim was to compare the use of FVC and VC, assessed as the highest value of FVC or slow vital capacity (SVC), when assessing the FEV1/VC ratio in a general population setting. The second aim was to evaluate the characteristics of subjects with COPD who obtained a higher SVC than FVC.
Methods: Subjects (n=1,050) aged 50-64 years were investigated with FEV1, FVC, and SVC after bronchodilation. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) COPDFVC was defined as FEV1/FVC <0.7, GOLDCOPDVC as FEV1/VC <0.7 using the maximum value of FVC or SVC, LLNCOPDFVC as FEV1/FVC below the LLN, and LLNCOPDVC as FEV1/VC below the LLN using the maximum value of FVC or SVC.
Results: Prevalence of GOLDCOPDFVC was 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.2-12.0) and the prevalence of LLNCOPDFVC was 9.5% (95% CI 7.8-11.4). When estimates were based on VC, the prevalence became higher; 16.4% (95% CI 14.3-18.9) and 15.6% (95% CI 13.5-17.9) for GOLDCOPDVC and LLNCOPDVC, respectively. The group of additional subjects classified as having COPD based on VC, had lower FEV1, more wheeze and higher residual volume compared to subjects without any COPD.
Conclusion: The prevalence of COPD was significantly higher when the ratio FEV1/VC was calculated using the highest value of SVC or FVC compared with using FVC only. Subjects classified as having COPD when using the VC concept were more obstructive and with indications of air trapping. Hence, the use of only FVC when assessing airflow limitation may result in a considerable under diagnosis of subjects with mild COPD.
Keywords: air trapping; asthma; epidemiology; general population; obstructive; slow vital capacity; spirometry.
References
-
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. [Accessed February 5, 2015]. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Report_2015.pdf.
-
- Siafakas NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, et al. on the behalf of the Task Force ERS Consensus statement. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Eur Respir J. 1995;8:1398–1420. - PubMed
-
- Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. ATS/ERS Task Force: Standardization of Lung function testing Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–968. - PubMed
-
- Redlich CA, Tarlo SM, Hankinson JL, et al. American Thoracic Society Committee on Spirometry in the occupational setting Official American Thoracic Society technical Standards: Spirometry in the occupational setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:984–994. - PubMed
-
- Bakke PS, Rönmark E, Eagan T, et al. European Respiratory Society Task Force Recommendations for epidemiological studies on COPD. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:1261–1277. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
