Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 3;3(1):e000089.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2016-000089. eCollection 2016.

Initial US evaluation of second-generation capsule colonoscopy for detecting colon polyps

Affiliations

Initial US evaluation of second-generation capsule colonoscopy for detecting colon polyps

Douglas R Morgan et al. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Capsule colonoscopy is an additional screening modality for colorectal cancer. Second-generation capsule colonoscopy (CC2) may have improved efficacy in the detection of colon adenomas as compared with prior devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of CC2 in the detection of polyps in symptomatic and screening patients in the USA.

Design: Prospective, multicentre study.

Setting and participants: Two academic medical centres and two private practice facilities, evaluating patients with indications for colonoscopy.

Methods: Patients underwent capsule colonoscopy procedure using magnesium citrate as a boost, followed by colonoscopy on the same day. The main outcome measurement was accuracy of CC2 for the detection of colorectal polyps ≥6 and ≥10 mm as compared with conventional colonoscopy.

Results: 51 patients were enrolled, 50 of whom had CC2 and colonoscopy examinations and were included in the accuracy analysis. 30% and 14% of patients had polyps ≥6 and ≥10 mm, respectively. For lesions ≥10 mm identified on conventional colonoscopy, CC2 sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 56.1% to 100%) with a specificity of 93.0% (79.9% to 98.2%). For polyps ≥6 mm, the CC2 sensitivity was 93.3% (66.0% to 99.7%) and the specificity was 80.0% (62.5% to 90.9%). There was a 61% adequate cleansing rate with 64% of CC2 procedures being complete.

Conclusions: In the initial US experience with CC2 there was adequate sensitivity for detecting patients with polyps ≥6 mm in size. Magnesium citrate was inadequate as a boost agent.

Trial registration number: NCT01087528.

Keywords: COLONIC ADENOMAS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; GASTROINTESINAL ENDOSCOPY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Colon capsule evaluation: patient flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A–D) Colon capsule images of polyps that were missed on initial colonoscopy. Capsule images of a 23 mm flat polyp (A) and a 12 mm sessile polyp (B), both of which were located in the ascending colon in a single patient. Neither polyp was identified on the initial colonoscopy, which prompted a second colonoscopy, where the matching lesions were identified (C and D, respectively).

References

    1. Wang A, Banerjee S, Barth BA, et al. , ASGE Technology Committee. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;78:805–15. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slawinski PR, Obstein KL, Valdastri P. Emerging issues and future developments in capsule endoscopy. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2015;17:40–6. doi:10.1016/j.tgie.2015.02.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Gossum A. Wireless capsule endoscopy of the large intestine: a review with future projections. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2014;30:472–6. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tal AO, Vermehren J, Albert JG. Colon capsule endoscopy: current status and future directions. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:16596–602. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. . Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570–95. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources