Results of a Multilevel Intervention Trial to Increase Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Uptake among Adolescent Girls
- PMID: 27196093
- PMCID: PMC4874659
- DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1243
Results of a Multilevel Intervention Trial to Increase Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Uptake among Adolescent Girls
Abstract
Background: Uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is low in Appalachian Ohio and areas with high cervical cancer rates.
Methods: We conducted a group-randomized trial among 12 counties in Appalachian Ohio randomized to receive either an HPV vaccine (intervention counties) or influenza vaccine (comparison counties) multilevel intervention (MLI). Parents (n = 337) who had a daughter aged 9 to 17 years who had not received the HPV vaccine were recruited from commercial lists. Clinics (N = 24) and 119 providers from these clinics were also recruited. The primary outcome was medical record-confirmed receipt of the first shot of the HPV vaccine 3 months after receiving the intervention among daughters of parents enrolled in the study. Secondary outcomes included receipt of the first HPV vaccine shot by 6 months and changes in provider knowledge.
Results: According to medical records, 10 (7.7%) daughters of intervention participants received the first shot of the HPV vaccine within 3 months of being sent the intervention materials compared with 4 (3.2%) daughters of comparison group participants (P = 0.061). By 6 months, 17 (13.1%) daughters of intervention participants received the first HPV vaccine shot compared with eight (6.5%) daughters of comparison group participants (P = 0.002). Provider knowledge about HPV increased (P < 0.001, from baseline to after education).
Conclusions: The MLI increased uptake of the HPV vaccine among girls aged 9 to 17 years; however, uptake was low.
Impact: To improve HPV vaccine uptake, attention to additional levels of influence (e.g., policy, community) and more elements within levels (e.g., reminders, automated prompts) may be needed. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(4); 593-602. ©2016 AACR SEE ALL ARTICLES IN THIS CEBP FOCUS SECTION, "MULTILEVEL APPROACHES TO ADDRESSING CANCER HEALTH DISPARITIES".
©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Schiffman M, Hildesheim A. Cervical cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3. New York: Oxford; 2006. pp. 1044–67.
-
- Mayne S, Morse D, Winn D. Cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3. New York: Oxford; 2006. pp. 674–96.
-
- Frisch M, Melbye M. Anal cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3. New York: Oxford; 2006. pp. 830–40.
-
- Madeline M, Daling J. Cancers of the vulva and vagina. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3. New York: Oxford; 2006. pp. 1068–74.
-
- Wideroff L, Schottenfeld D. Penile cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J, editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3. New York: Oxford; 2006. pp. 1166–72.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical