Association of Physical Activity by Type and Intensity With Digestive System Cancer Risk
- PMID: 27196375
- PMCID: PMC5846204
- DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0740
Association of Physical Activity by Type and Intensity With Digestive System Cancer Risk
Erratum in
-
Incomplete Conflict of Interest Disclosures.JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):579. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0286. JAMA Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30844032 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Importance: Accumulating evidence indicates that common carcinogenic pathways may underlie digestive system cancers. Physical activity may influence these pathways. Yet, to our knowledge, no previous study has evaluated the role of physical activity in overall digestive system cancer risk.
Objective: To examine the association between physical activity and digestive system cancer risk, accounting for amount, type (aerobic vs resistance), and intensity of physical activity.
Design, setting, and participants: A prospective cohort study followed 43 479 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study from 1986 to 2012. At enrollment, the eligible participants were 40 years or older, were free of cancer, and reported physical activity. Follow-up rates exceeded 90% in each 2-year cycle.
Exposures: The amount of total physical activity expressed in metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-hours/week.
Main outcomes and measures: Incident cancer of the digestive system encompassing the digestive tract (mouth, throat, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and colorectum) and digestive accessory organs (pancreas, gallbladder, and liver).
Results: Over 686 924 person-years, we documented 1370 incident digestive system cancers. Higher levels of physical activity were associated with lower digestive system cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 for ≥63.0 vs ≤8.9 MET-hours/week; 95% CI, 0.59-0.93; P value for trend = .003). The inverse association was more evident with digestive tract cancers (HR, 0.66 for ≥63.0 vs ≤8.9 MET-hours/week; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87) than with digestive accessary organ cancers. Aerobic exercise was particularly beneficial against digestive system cancers, with the optimal benefit observed at approximately 30 MET-hours/week (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83; P value for nonlinearity = .02). Moreover, as long as the same level of MET-hour score was achieved from aerobic exercise, the magnitude of risk reduction was similar regardless of intensity of aerobic exercise.
Conclusions and relevance: Physical activity, as indicated by MET-hours/week, was inversely associated with the risk of digestive system cancers, particularly digestive tract cancers, in men. The optimal benefit was observed through aerobic exercise of any intensity at the equivalent of energy expenditure of approximately 10 hours/week of walking at average pace. Future studies are warranted to confirm our findings and to translate them into clinical and public health recommendation.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Comment in
-
Omitted Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest in Articles Published in JAMA Oncology.JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):578-579. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0235. JAMA Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30844040 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dong J, Dai J, Zhang M, Hu Z, Shen H. Potentially functional COX-2-1195G>A polymorphism increases the risk of digestive system cancers: a meta-analysis. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2010 Jun;25(6):1042–1050. - PubMed
-
- Algra AM, Rothwell PM. Effects of regular aspirin on long-term cancer incidence and metastasis: a systematic comparison of evidence from observational studies versus randomised trials. The Lancet Oncology. 2012 May;13(5):518–527. - PubMed
-
- Langley RE, Rothwell PM. Aspirin in gastrointestinal oncology: new data on an old friend. Current opinion in oncology. 2014 Jul;26(4):441–447. - PubMed
-
- Lee YY, Yang YP, Huang PI, et al. Exercise suppresses COX-2 pro-inflammatory pathway in vestibular migraine. Brain research bulletin. 2015 Jul;116:98–105. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous