Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;7(4):264-75.
doi: 10.1002/wcs.1393. Epub 2016 May 19.

Language learning, socioeconomic status, and child-directed speech

Affiliations
Review

Language learning, socioeconomic status, and child-directed speech

Jessica F Schwab et al. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Young children's language experiences and language outcomes are highly variable. Research in recent decades has focused on understanding the extent to which family socioeconomic status (SES) relates to parents' language input to their children and, subsequently, children's language learning. Here, we first review research demonstrating differences in the quantity and quality of language that children hear across low-, mid-, and high-SES groups, but also-and perhaps more importantly-research showing that differences in input and learning also exist within SES groups. Second, in order to better understand the defining features of 'high-quality' input, we highlight findings from laboratory studies examining specific characteristics of the sounds, words, sentences, and social contexts of child-directed speech (CDS) that influence children's learning. Finally, after narrowing in on these particular features of CDS, we broaden our discussion by considering family and community factors that may constrain parents' ability to participate in high-quality interactions with their young children. A unification of research on SES and CDS will facilitate a more complete understanding of the specific means by which input shapes learning, as well as generate ideas for crafting policies and programs designed to promote children's language outcomes. WIREs Cogn Sci 2016, 7:264-275. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1393 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

References

    1. Arriaga RI, Fenson L, Cronan T, Pethick SJ. Scores on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory of children from low and middle-income families. Appl Psycholinguist. 1998;19:209–223. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400010043. - DOI
    1. Morgan PL, Farkas G, Hillemeier MM, Hammer CS, Maczuga S. 24-month-old children with larger oral vocabularies display greater academic and behavioral functioning at kindergarten entry. Child Dev. 2015;86:1351–1370. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12398. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hart B, Risley TR. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 1995.
    1. Weisleder A, Fernald A. Talking to children matters: early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:2143–2152. doi: 10.1177/0956797613488145. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huttenlocher J, Waterfall H, Vasilyeva M, Hedges LV. Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cogn Psychol. 2010;61:343–365. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources