Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep 7;11(9):1703-1712.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.09780915. Epub 2016 May 19.

Patient and Other Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Funded Studies of Patients with Kidney Diseases

Affiliations
Review

Patient and Other Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Funded Studies of Patients with Kidney Diseases

Daniel Cukor et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Including target populations in the design and implementation of research trials has been one response to the growing health disparities endemic to our health care system, as well as an aid to study generalizability. One type of community-based participatory research is "Patient Centered-Research", in which patient perspectives on the germane research questions and methodologies are incorporated into the study. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) has mandated that meaningful patient and stakeholder engagement be incorporated into all applications. As of March 2015, PCORI funded seven clinically-focused studies of patients with kidney disease. The goal of this paper is to synthesize the experiences of these studies to gain an understanding of how meaningful patient and stakeholder engagement can occur in clinical research of kidney diseases, and what the key barriers are to its implementation. Our collective experience suggests that successful implementation of a patient- and stakeholder-engaged research paradigm involves: (1) defining the roles and process for the incorporation of input; (2) identifying the particular patients and other stakeholders; (3) engaging patients and other stakeholders so they appreciate the value of their own participation and have personal investment in the research process; and (4) overcoming barriers and challenges that arise and threaten the productivity of the collaboration. It is our hope that the experiences of these studies will further interest and capacity for incorporating patient and stakeholder perspectives in research of kidney diseases.

Keywords: Community-Based Participatory Research; Humans; Patient Outcome Assessment; chronic kidney disease; clinical nephrology; depression; diabetic nephropathy; dialysis; end-stage renal disease; kidney disease; nephrotic syndrome; randomized controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wallerstein N, Duran B: The conceptual, historical, and practice roots of community based participatory arch and related participatory traditions. In: Community-Based Participatory Research for Health, edited by Minkler M and Wallerstein N, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2003
    1. Laine C, Davidoff F: Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA 275: 152–156, 1996 - PubMed
    1. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB; Community-Campus Partnerships for Health: Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health (Abingdon) 14: 182–197, 2001 - PubMed
    1. Available at: https://obssr-archive.od.nih.gov/scientific_areas/methodology/community_.... Accessed May 1, 2016
    1. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB: Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 19: 173–202, 1998 - PubMed

Publication types