Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 20;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12-7.
doi: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s011.

The Renewed Promise of Medical Informatics

Affiliations

The Renewed Promise of Medical Informatics

J H van Bemmel et al. Yearb Med Inform. .

Abstract

The promise of the field of Medical Informatics has been great and its impact has been significant. In 1999, the Yearbook editors of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) - also the authors of the present paper - sought to assess this impact by selecting a number of seminal papers in the field, and asking experts to comment on these articles. In particular, it was requested whether and how the expectations, represented by these papers, had been fulfilled since their publication several decades earlier. Each expert was also invited to comment on what might be expected in the future. In the present paper, these areas are briefly reviewed again. Where did these early papers have an impact and where were they not as successful as originally expected? It should be noted that the extraordinary developments in computer technology observed in the last two decades could not have been foreseen by these early researchers. In closing, some of the possibilities and limitations of research in medical informatics are outlined in the context of a framework that considers six levels of computer applications in medicine and health care. For each level, some predictions are made for the future, concluded with thoughts on fruitful areas for ongoing research in the field.

Keywords: Medical Informatics; clinical decision support; computing methodologies; electronic health records; forecasting; history; information systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Model of computer applications in medicine and health care.
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Seminal Papers from the 1999 Yearbook

    1. Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med 1968;278:652-7. - PubMed
    1. Collen MF. General requirements for a medical information system. Comp Biomed Res 1970;3:393-406. - PubMed
    1. Côté RA. The SNOP-SNOMED concept: Evolution towards common medical nomenclature and classification. Pathologist 1979;31:383-9. - PubMed
    1. Reichertz PL, Möhr JR, Schwarz B, Schlatter A, von Gärtner-Holthoff G, Filsinger E. Evaluation of a field test of computers for the doctor’s office. Methods Inf Med 1979;18:61-70. - PubMed
    1. Barnett GO, Justice NS, Somand ME, Adams BD, Waxman PD, Beaman MS, et al. COSTAR - A computer-based medical information system for ambulatory care. Proc IEEE 1979;67:1226-37.

Other References

    1. Grémy F. Hardware, software, peopleware, subjectivity. A philosophical promenade. Methods Inf Med 2005;44(3):352-8. - PubMed
    1. Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. Rising expectations: access to biomedical information. Yearb Med Inform 2008:165-72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer JR, Appel RD. The Health on the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Web sites. Comp Biol Med 1998;28:603-10. - PubMed
    1. Van Bemmel JH. A comprehensive model for medical information processing. Methods Inf Med 1983;22:12430. - PubMed
    1. Shortliffe EH. Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. New York: Elsevier; 1976.

Publication types