Accurate Point-of-Care Detection of Ruptured Fetal Membranes: Improved Diagnostic Performance Characteristics with a Monoclonal/Polyclonal Immunoassay
- PMID: 27199579
- PMCID: PMC4862745
- DOI: 10.4137/CMRH.S38386
Accurate Point-of-Care Detection of Ruptured Fetal Membranes: Improved Diagnostic Performance Characteristics with a Monoclonal/Polyclonal Immunoassay
Abstract
Objective: Accurate and timely diagnosis of rupture of membranes (ROM) is imperative to allow for gestational age-specific interventions. This study compared the diagnostic performance characteristics between two methods used for the detection of ROM as measured in the same patient.
Methods: Vaginal secretions were evaluated using the conventional fern test as well as a point-of-care monoclonal/polyclonal immunoassay test (ROM Plus(®)) in 75 pregnant patients who presented to labor and delivery with complaints of leaking amniotic fluid. Both tests were compared to analytical confirmation of ROM using three external laboratory tests. Diagnostic performance characteristics were calculated including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy.
Results: Diagnostic performance characteristics uniformly favored ROM detection using the immunoassay test compared to the fern test: sensitivity (100% vs. 77.8%), specificity (94.8% vs. 79.3%), PPV (75% vs. 36.8%), NPV (100% vs. 95.8%), and accuracy (95.5% vs. 79.1%).
Conclusions: The point-of-care immunoassay test provides improved diagnostic accuracy for the detection of ROM compared to fern testing. It has the potential of improving patient management decisions, thereby minimizing serious complications and perinatal morbidity.
Keywords: ROM Plus®; alpha-fetoprotein; fern test; insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1; placental protein 12; point-of-care immunoassay; premature rupture of membranes.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of rapid immunoassays for rupture of fetal membranes.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1311-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28446135 Free PMC article.
-
ROM Plus(®): accurate point-of-care detection of ruptured fetal membranes.Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 May 9;9:69-74. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S106106. eCollection 2016. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016. PMID: 27274316 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnosing rupture of membranes using combination monoclonal/polyclonal immunologic protein detection.J Reprod Med. 2013 May-Jun;58(5-6):187-94. J Reprod Med. 2013. PMID: 23763001
-
Placental alpha-microglobulin-1 rapid immunoassay for detection of premature rupture of membranes.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 Jan;38(1):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01688.x. Epub 2011 Nov 9. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012. Retraction in: J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 Jun;38(6):962. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01931.x. Retraction in: J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 Jan;38(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01931.x. PMID: 22070530 Retracted.
-
[Which biological test to confirm rupture of membranes?].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Apr;41(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 9. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012. PMID: 22227234 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Current and Emerging Strategies for Prediction and Diagnosis of Prelabour Rupture of the Membranes: A Narrative Review.Malays J Med Sci. 2021 Jun;28(3):5-17. doi: 10.21315/mjms2021.28.3.2. Epub 2021 Jun 30. Malays J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34285641 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of rapid immunoassays for rupture of fetal membranes.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1311-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28446135 Free PMC article.
-
Point-of-care diagnostics to improve maternal and neonatal health in low-resource settings.Lab Chip. 2017 Oct 11;17(20):3351-3387. doi: 10.1039/c7lc00374a. Lab Chip. 2017. PMID: 28832061 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Prevalence and Payer Costs of Potentially Avoidable Emergent Care Visits for Suspected Amniotic Membrane Rupture in Pregnant Women.Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018 Jul;11(5):241-250. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018. PMID: 30464792 Free PMC article.
-
ROM Plus(®): accurate point-of-care detection of ruptured fetal membranes.Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 May 9;9:69-74. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S106106. eCollection 2016. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016. PMID: 27274316 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bulletins-Obstetrics ACoP ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 80: premature rupture of membranes. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):1007–1019. - PubMed
-
- Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: prediction of preterm premature rupture of membranes through clinical findings and ancillary testing. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(3):738–745. - PubMed
-
- Naeye RL, Peters EC. Causes and consequences of premature rupture of fetal membranes. Lancet. 1980;1(8161):192–194. - PubMed
-
- Ananth CV, Oyelese Y, Srinivas N, Yeo L, Vintzileos AM. Preterm premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine infection, and oligohydramnios: risk factors for placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):71–77. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials