Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 2:7:565.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00565. eCollection 2016.

Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Workplace Incivility: Who Is Most Targeted and Who Is Most Harmed?

Lauren Zurbrügg  1 , Kathi N Miner  2
Affiliations

Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Workplace Incivility: Who Is Most Targeted and Who Is Most Harmed?

Lauren Zurbrügg et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Scholars have proposed that interpersonal workplace discrimination toward members of oppressed social groups has become covert and subtle rather than overt and explicit and that such experiences lead to negative outcomes for targets. The present study examined this proposition by examining experiences and consequences of workplace incivility-a seemingly harmless form of interpersonal maltreatment-based on gender, sexual orientation, and their intersection. A sample of 1,300 academic faculty (52% male, 86% White) participated in an online survey study assessing their experiences of workplace incivility, job stress, job satisfaction, job identity centrality, and demographics. Results showed that sexual minority women reported the highest levels of workplace incivility. Findings also revealed that women reported lower job satisfaction than men and that heterosexuals reported higher job stress and lower job identity centrality than sexual minorities with higher levels of incivility. Thus, sexual minority status buffered the negative effects of incivility for sexual minorities. These findings point to the resiliency of sexual minorities in the face of interpersonal stressors at work.

Keywords: gender; intersectionality; minority stress; occupational well-being; sexual orientation; workplace incivilty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Interaction of gender and sexual orientation on workplace incivility.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Interaction of workplace incivility and sexual orientation on job stress.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Interaction of workplace incivility and gender on job satisfaction.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Interaction of workplace incivility and sexual orientation on job identity centrality.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Acker J. (2006). Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender Soc. 20 441–464. 10.1177/0891243206289499 - DOI
    1. Andersson L. M., Pearson C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24 452–471. 10.2307/259136 - DOI
    1. Balsam K. F., Molina Y., Beadnell B., Simoni J., Walters K. (2011). Measuring multiple minority stress: the LGBT people of color microaggressions scale. Cult. Divers Ethnic. Minor. Psychol. 17 163–174. 10.1037/a0023244 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bostwick W., Hequembourg A. (2014). ‘Just a little hint’: bisexual-specific microaggressions and their connection to epistemic injustices. Cult. Health Sex. 16 488–503. 10.1080/13691058.2014.889754 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowling N. A., Hammond G. D. (2008). A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the michigan organizational assessment questionnaire job satisfaction subscale. J. Vocat. Behav. 73 63–77. 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.004 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources