Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;22(2):101-9.
doi: 10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.101. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

Association of EMR Adoption with Minority Health Care Outcome Disparities in US Hospitals

Affiliations

Association of EMR Adoption with Minority Health Care Outcome Disparities in US Hospitals

Jae-Young Choi et al. Healthc Inform Res. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Disparities in healthcare among minority groups can result in disparate treatments for similar severities of symptoms, unequal access to medical care, and a wide deviation in health outcomes. Such racial disparities may be reduced via use of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system. However, there has been little research investigating the impact of EMR systems on the disparities in health outcomes among minority groups.

Methods: This study examined the impact of EMR systems on the following four outcomes of black patients: length of stay, inpatient mortality rate, 30-day mortality rate, and 30-day readmission rate, using patient and hospital data from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society between 2000 and 2007. The difference-in-difference research method was employed with a generalized linear model to examine the association of EMR adoption on health outcomes for minority patients while controlling for patient and hospital characteristics.

Results: We examined the association between EMR adoption and the outcomes of minority patients, specifically black patients. However, after controlling for patient and hospital characteristics we could not find any significant changes in the four health outcomes of minority patients before and after EMR implementation.

Conclusions: EMR systems have been reported to support better coordinated care, thus encouraging appropriate treatment for minority patients by removing potential sources of bias from providers. Also, EMR systems may improve the quality of care provided to patients via increased responsiveness to care processes that are required to be more time-sensitive and through improved communication. However, we did not find any significant benefit for minority groups after EMR adoption.

Keywords: Electronic Medical Records; Length of Stay; Mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

References

    1. Rubio M, Williams DR. The social dimension of race. In: Beech BM, Goodman M, editors. Race and research: perspectives on minority participation in health studies. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 2004. pp. 1–25.
    1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2003. - PubMed
    1. Lee J, Dowd B. Effect of health information technology expenditure on patient level cost. Healthc Inform Res. 2013;19(3):215–221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charles D, Gabriel M, Furukawa MF. Adoption of electronic health record systems among U.S. non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008-2013 [Internet] Washington (DC): Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2014. [cited 2016 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/oncdatabrief16.pdf.
    1. Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA. 2011;305(7):675–681. - PMC - PubMed