Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 20;11(5):e0156179.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156179. eCollection 2016.

Survey of Attitudes toward Uterus Transplantation among Japanese Women of Reproductive Age: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Survey of Attitudes toward Uterus Transplantation among Japanese Women of Reproductive Age: A Cross-Sectional Study

Iori Kisu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Uterus transplantation (UTx) is a potential option for women with uterine factor infertility to have a child, but there has been no large-scale survey of the views on UTx in women of reproductive age in Japan. The present study was aimed to clarify the views of Japanese women of reproductive age on UTx for uterine factor infertility.

Methods: A questionnaire on UTx was conducted by an Internet research company in December 2014 as a cross-sectional study in 3,892 randomly chosen women aged 25 to 39 years old. Responses were analyzed from 3,098 subjects (mean age 32.1±4.2 years old), after exclusion of inappropriate respondents in screening.

Results: Of the respondents, 62.1%, 34.7% and 18.1% favored adoption, UTx and gestational surrogacy, respectively. In contrast, 7.0%, 21.9% and 63.3% opposed adoption, UTx and gestational surrogacy, respectively. In choices of candidates for UTx based on highest priority, deceased persons (33.8%) and mothers (19.0%) were favored as donors, and women with congenital absence of the uterus (54.4%) and hysterectomy due to a malignant uterine tumor (20.0%) as recipients. Regarding societal acceptance of UTx, the answer rates were 15.7% for "UTx should be permitted", 77.6% for "UTx should be permitted with discussion", and 6.7% for "UTx should not be permitted, even with discussion". Regarding personal opinions on UTx, 44.2% were in favor, 47.5% had no opinion, and 8.3% were against.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that many Japanese women of reproductive age feel that UTx is socially and individually acceptable, but that concerns requiring further discussion remain among these women. There was also a tendency for UTx to be viewed more favorably than gestational surrogacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Screening of respondents to the questionnaire.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Candidate donors for UTx.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Candidate recipients for UTx.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Reasons for wanting UTx.
A. We want a child with genes inherited from us. B. There are no ethical problems because the sperm and ovum are ours, even though the uterus is not. C. If the uterus is eliminated after delivery, immunosuppressants are transiently administered. D. Pregnancy and delivery improve maternal feelings, in contrast to gestational surrogacy and adoption. E. Women suffering from uterine factor infertility will have the hope to have a child. F. We want a child by self-delivery who is recognized as ours (the couple's) in the Japanese Civil Code. G. Other reasons.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Reasons for not wanting UTx.
A. Transplant should be performed only for vital organs, and not for having a child. B. I am afraid of the surgery itself. C. I am worried about the effect of immunosuppressants on a child (anomaly). D. Immunosuppressants are needed. E. I do not want pregnancy and delivery to be risks for myself and the donor. F. Hope should not be easily given to women who have lost their uterus. G. Other reasons.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Support for treatment options for uterine factor infertility.
(Multiple answers allowed).

References

    1. Arora KS, Blake V. Uterus transplantation: the ethics of moving the womb. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:971–974. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000707 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johannesson L, Dahm-Kähler P, Eklind S, Brännström M. The future of human uterus transplantation. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2014;10:455–467. - PubMed
    1. Kisu I, Banno K, Mihara M, Suganuma N, Aoki D. Current status of uterus transplantation in primates and issues for clinical application. Fertil Steril 2013;100:280–94. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, Dahm-Kähler P, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet 2015;385:607–616. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61728-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. 2012 Report of the Ethics Committee and Registration and Investigation Subcommittee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Acta Obstetrica et Gynaecologica Japonica 2014;66: 2445–2454.(Japanese)