Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;24(1):20-26.
doi: 10.1177/0969141316641982. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark

Affiliations

Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark

Katja Kemp Jacobsen et al. J Med Screen. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background The purpose of mammography screening is to decrease breast cancer mortality. To achieve this a high coverage by examination is needed. Within an organized screening programme, we examined the impact of changes in the invitation schedule on the interplay between coverage and participation. Method We studied nine cohorts aged 50-51 when first targeted by mammography screening in Copenhagen, Denmark. Population data were retrieved from the Danish Civil Registration System; invitation and attendance data from the screening programme database. Data were linked using unique personal identification numbers. Coverage by invitation was defined as (number of invited women/number of targeted women), coverage by examination as (number of screened women/number of targeted women), and participation rate as (number of screened women/number of invited women). Results Coverage by invitation was close to or above 95% for all newly recruited cohorts. In subsequent invitation rounds, both technical errors and changes in the invitation scheme affected the coverage by invitation. Coverage by examination at first invitation was 72.5% for the first cohort, but dropped to 64.2% for the latest cohort. Furthermore, coverage by examination dropped by increasing invitation number and with omission of re-invitation of previous non-attenders. Participation rate closely reflected changes in the invitation scheme. Conclusion Changes in the invitation schemes influenced coverage by invitation, coverage by examination, and participation rate. We observed a considerable gap between coverage by examination and participation rate, strongly indicating that the latter cannot without reservations, be taken as an indicator of the first.

Keywords: Attendance; breast cancer; mammography; mass screening; protective effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cohorts of women first targeted by the Copenhagen programme at age 50–51 by age, invitation rounds, and invitation numbers (marked in graph).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Average coverage by examination (%) for cohorts of women first targeted by the Copenhagen programme age 50–51 by invitation number and invitation round.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Coverage by examination (%) and participation rate (%) for cohorts of women first targeted by the Copenhagen programme age 50–51 by invitation number.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perry N, Broeders M, de WC, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 614–622. - PubMed
    1. Giordano L, von KL, Tomatis M, et al. Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation. J Med Screen 2012; 19: 72–82. - PubMed
    1. Domingo L, Jacobsen KK, von Euler-Chelpin M, et al. Seventeen-years overview of breast cancer inside and outside screening in Denmark. Acta Oncol 2013; 52: 48–56. - PubMed
    1. von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, et al. Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer 2008; 122: 418–423. - PubMed
    1. Jacobsen KK, von Euler-Chelpin M. Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012; 34: 272–278. - PubMed