Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul-Aug;92(4):374-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2015.10.006. Epub 2016 May 18.

Neonatal screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in Brazil

Affiliations
Free article

Neonatal screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in Brazil

Marilia Pyles Patto Kanegae et al. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016 Jul-Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To apply, in Brazil, the T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) quantification technique using real-time polymerase chain reaction in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and assess the feasibility of implementing it on a large scale in Brazil.

Methods: 8715 newborn blood samples were collected on filter paper and, after DNA elution, TRECs were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The cutoff value to determine whether a sample was abnormal was determined by ROC curve analysis, using SSPS.

Results: The concentration of TRECs in 8,682 samples ranged from 2 to 2,181TRECs/μL of blood, with mean and median of 324 and 259TRECs/μL, respectively. Forty-nine (0.56%) samples were below the cutoff (30TRECs/μL) and were reanalyzed. Four (0.05%) samples had abnormal results (between 16 and 29TRECs/μL). Samples from patients previously identified as having severe combined immunodeficiency or DiGeorge syndrome were used to validate the assay and all of them showed TRECs below the cutoff. Preterm infants had lower levels of TRECs than full-term neonates. The ROC curve showed a cutoff of 26TRECs/μL, with 100% sensitivity for detecting severe combined immunodeficiency. Using this value, retest and referral rates were 0.43% (37 samples) and 0.03% (3 samples), respectively.

Conclusion: The technique is reliable and can be applied on a large scale after the training of technical teams throughout Brazil.

Keywords: Combined immunodeficiency; Imunodeficiência combinada; Imunodeficiência primária; Linfócitos T; Neonatal screening; Primary immunodeficiency; SCID; T lymphocytes; TRECs; Triagem neonatal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances